Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32971419›Full record

SynthesisEnvironment international2020

Bayesian hierarchical dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies: Modeling and target population prediction methods.

Bruce Allen, Kan Shao, Kevin Hobbie, William Mendez, Janice S Lee, Ila Cote, Ingrid Druwe, Jeffrey S Gift, J Allen Davis

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environment international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Benchmark dose modeling for epidemiological dose-response assessment using case-control studies.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  6. Benchmark dose modeling for epidemiological dose-response assessment using prospective cohort studies.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bruce AllenIndependent Consultant, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kan ShaoDepartment of Environmental Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Kevin HobbieICF, 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031-1207, USA.
William MendezICF, 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031-1207, USA.
Janice S LeeCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Ila CoteCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Ingrid DruweCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Jeffrey S GiftCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
J Allen DavisCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: davis.allen@epa.gov.
Environmental Protection Agency · USICF International (United States) · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When assessing the human risks due to exposure to environmental chemicals, traditional dose-response analyses are not straightforward when there are numerous high-quality epidemiological studies of priority cancer and non-cancer health outcomes. Given this wealth of information, selecting a single "best" study on which to base dose-response analyses is difficult and would potentially ignore much of the available data. Therefore, systematic approaches are necessary for the analysis of these rich databases. Examples are meta-analysis (and further, meta-regression), which are well established methods that consider and incorporate information from multiple studies into the estimation of risks due to exposure to environmental contaminants. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical, Bayesian meta-analysis approach for the dose-response analysis of multiple epidemiological studies. This paper is the second of two papers detailing this approach; the first covered "pre-analysis" steps necessary to prepare the data for dose-response modeling. This paper focuses on the hierarchical Bayesian approach to dose-response modeling and extrapolation of risk to populations of interest using the association between bladder cancer and oral inorganic arsenic (iAs) exposure as an illustrative case study. In particular, this paper addresses the modeling of both case-control and cohort studies with a flexible, logistic model in a hierarchical Bayesian framework that estimates study-specific slopes, as well as a pooled slope across all studies. This approach is akin to a random effects model in which no assumption is made a priori that there is a single, common slope for all included studies. Further, this paper also details extrapolation of the estimates of logistic slope to extra risk in a target population using a lifetable analysis and basic assumptions about background iAs exposure levels. In this case, the target population was the general United States population and information on all-cause mortality and incidence and mortality from bladder cancer was used to perform the lifetable analysis. The methods herein were developed for general use in investigating the association between any pollutant and observed health-effects in epidemiological studies. In order to demonstrate these methods, inorganic arsenic was chosen as a case study given the large epidemiological database that exists for this contaminant.

Indexed as

ArsenicalsBayes TheoremCohort StudiesEpidemiologic StudiesHumansIncidenceUnited StatesArsenicalsBayesian dose-responseHierarchical modelLifetable analysisMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID32971419
PMCPMC7780081
OpenAlexW3088692385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.