Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32971366›Full record

ReviewJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences2020

Advances in venomics: Modern separation techniques and mass spectrometry.

Tarek Mohamed Abd El-Aziz, Antonio G Soares, James D Stockand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. ImprovingF1000Research · 2024
    Article
  10. Molecular Mechanisms of Animal Toxins, Venoms and Antivenoms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tarek Mohamed Abd El-AzizDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA; Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Minia University, El-Minia 61519, Egypt. Electronic address: mohamedt1@uthscsa.edu.
Antonio G SoaresDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA.
James D StockandDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA.

Funding

Purinergic regulation of ENaC in the distal nephronR01DK113816 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI STOCKAND, JAMES D · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
Regulation of ENaC by Casein Kinase 2R01DK117909 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI STOCKAND, JAMES D · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK113816NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK117909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snake venoms are complex chemical mixtures of biologically active proteins and non-protein components. Toxins have a wide range of targets and effects to include ion channels and membrane receptors, and platelet aggregation and platelet plug formation. Toxins target these effectors and effects at high affinity and selectivity. From a pharmacological perspective, snake venom compounds are a valuable resource for drug discovery and development. However, a major challenge to drug discovery using snake venoms is isolating and analyzing the bioactive proteins and peptides in these complex mixtures. Getting molecular information from complex mixtures such as snake venoms requires proteomic analyses, generally combined with transcriptomic analyses of venom glands. The present review summarizes current knowledge and highlights important recent advances in venomics with special emphasis on contemporary separation techniques and bioinformatics that have begun to elaborate the complexity of snake venoms. Several analytical techniques such as two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, RP-HPLC, size exclusion chromatography, ion exchange chromatography, MALDI-TOF-MS, and LC-ESI-QTOF-MS have been employed in this regard. The improvement of separation approaches such as multidimensional-HPLC, 2D-electrophoresis coupled to soft-ionization (MALDI and ESI) mass spectrometry has been critical to obtain an accurate picture of the startling complexity of venoms. In the case of bioinformatics, a variety of software tools such as PEAKS also has been used successfully. Such information gleaned from venomics is important to both predicting and resolving the biological activity of the active components of venoms, which in turn is key for the development of new drugs based on these venom components.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryProteomicsVenomsAnimalsArthropodsChromatography, LiquidDrug DiscoveryElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalProteomeSnailsSnakesProteomeVenomsAnimal venomsDrug discoveryMass spectrometrySeparation methodsVenomic

Identifiers

PMID32971366
PMCPMC8174749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.