Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32970879›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2021

Improving area of occupancy estimates for parapatric species using distribution models and support vector machines.

Jamie M Kass, Sarah I Meenan, Nicolás Tinoco, Santiago F Burneo, Robert P Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Integrating habitat-masked range maps with quantifications of prevalence to estimate area of occupancy in IUCN assessments.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Improving area of occupancy estimates for parapatric species using distribution models and support vector machines.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jamie M KassPh.D. Program in Biology, The Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, New York, 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9432-895X
Sarah I MeenanDepartment of Biology, City College of New York (CUNY), New York, New York, 10031, USA.
Nicolás TinocoMuseo de Zoología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Avenida 12 de Octubre, 1076 y Roca, 170517, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-2196-1199
Santiago F BurneoMuseo de Zoología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Avenida 12 de Octubre, 1076 y Roca, 170517, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0003-0696-1817
Robert P AndersonPh.D. Program in Biology, The Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, New York, 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7706-4649

Funding

Shared Services Center NASA 80NSSC18K0406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As geographic range estimates for the IUCN Red List guide conservation actions, accuracy and ecological realism are crucial. IUCN's extent of occurrence (EOO) is the general region including the species' range, while area of occupancy (AOO) is the subset of EOO occupied by the species. Data-poor species with incomplete sampling present particular difficulties, but species distribution models (SDMs) can be used to predict suitable areas. Nevertheless, SDMs typically employ abiotic variables (i.e., climate) and do not explicitly account for biotic interactions that can impose range constraints. We sought to improve range estimates for data-poor, parapatric species by masking out areas under inferred competitive exclusion. We did so for two South American spiny pocket mice: Heteromys australis (Least Concern) and Heteromys teleus (Vulnerable due to especially poor sampling), whose ranges appear restricted by competition. For both species, we estimated EOO using SDMs and AOO with four approaches: occupied grid cells, abiotic SDM prediction, and this prediction masked by approximations of the areas occupied by each species' congener. We made the masks using support vector machines (SVMs) fit with two data types: occurrence coordinates alone; and coordinates along with SDM predictions of suitability. Given the uncertainty in calculating AOO for low-data species, we made estimates for the lower and upper bounds for AOO, but only make recommendations for H. teleus as its full known range was considered. The SVM approaches (especially the second one) had lower classification error and made more ecologically realistic delineations of the contact zone. For H. teleus, the lower AOO bound (a strongly biased underestimate) corresponded to Endangered (occupied grid cells), while the upper bounds (other approaches) led to Near Threatened. As we currently lack data to determine the species' true occupancy within the post-processed SDM prediction, we recommend that an updated listing for H. teleus include these bounds for AOO. This study advances methods for estimating the upper bound of AOO and highlights the need for better ways to produce unbiased estimates of lower bounds. More generally, the SVM approaches for post-processing SDM predictions hold promise for improving range estimates for other uses in biogeography and conservation.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeSupport Vector MachineAnimalsClimateEcosystemMicearea of occupancybiotic interactioncompetitionextent of occurrenceparapatricrange limitsRed Listrodentspecies distribution modelsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID32970879
PMCPMC7816235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.