Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32970852›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2020

Feasibility of fecal microbiota transplantation via oral gavage to safely alter gut microbiome composition in marmosets.

Corinna N Ross, Kelly R Reveles

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Association of Primate Veterinarians Guidelines for the Management of Diarrhea.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023
    Article
  5. Dual cognitive and mobility impairments and future dementia - Setting a research agenda.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Corinna N RossDepartment of Science and Mathematics, Texas A&M University San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0299-2069
Kelly R RevelesCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Austin College · USTexas Biomedical Research Institute · US

Funding

Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUM1TR004538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI ROBERT A CLARK, Kenneth M Hargreaves · 2023 to 2026
$22.3M
San Antonio OAIC - Research Education Component (REC)P30AG044271 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Adam Salmon, Elena Volpi · 2015 to 2026
$14.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004538NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruption of microbial communities within human hosts has been associated with infection, obesity, cognitive decline, cancer risk and frailty, suggesting that microbiome-targeted therapies may be an option for improving healthspan and lifespan. The objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of delivering fecal microbiota transplants (FMTs) to marmosets via oral gavage and to evaluate if alteration of the gut microbiome post-FMT could be achieved. This was a prospective study of marmosets housed at the Barshop Institute for Longevity and Aging Studies in San Antonio, Texas. Eligible animals included healthy young adult males (age 2-5 years) with no recent medication use. Stool from two donors was combined and administered in 0.5 ml doses to five young recipients once weekly for 3 weeks. Safety outcomes and alterations in the gut microbiome composition via 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing were compared at baseline and monthly up to 6 months post-FMT. Overall, significant differences in the percent relative abundance was seen in FMT recipients at the phylum and family levels from baseline to 1 month and baseline to 6 months post-FMT. In permutational multivariate analysis of variance analyses, treatment status (donor vs. recipient) (p = .056) and time course (p = .019) predicted β diversity (p = .056). The FMT recipients did not experience any negative health outcomes over the course of the treatment. FMT via oral gavage was safe to administer to young adult marmosets. The marmoset microbiome may be altered by FMT; however, progressive changes in the microbiome are strongly driven by the host and its baseline microbiome composition.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdministration, OralAnimalsAnimals, ZooBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaCallithrixFeasibility StudiesFecal Microbiota TransplantationMaleTexasagingfecal microbiota transplantationgut microbiotahealthspan

Identifiers

PMID32970852
PMCPMC7679041
OpenAlexW3088162798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.