ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2020
Early life disruption of the microbiota affects organ development and cytokine gene expression in threespine stickleback.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A host of issues: pseudoreplication in host-microbiota studies.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Importance of human microbiome: an update.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2026Review
- Dynamics of Gut Microbiota in Japanese Tits (Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Association between Turbot (Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Early-life factors shaping the gut microbiota of Common buzzard nestlings.Animal microbiome · 2024Article
- Captivity and Animal Microbiomes: Potential Roles of Microbiota for Influencing Animal Conservation.Microbial ecology · 2023Review
- The Gut Microbial Composition Is Species-Specific and Individual-Specific in Two Species of Estrildid Finches, the Bengalese Finch and the Zebra Finch.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The microbiota that inhabits vertebrates exerts strong effects on host physiology and can be crucial to the development of a normal phenotype. This includes development of the immune system, somatic growth and maintenance, and morphogenesis. However, the genetic background of the host can also affect these life history traits. To this end, we investigated the effects of the microbiota on growth, development, and immune gene expression on two populations of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), one anadromous and one freshwater. We tested the hypotheses that microbial colonization and the genetic background of the host would affect survival, cytokine gene expression, growth, and development. We raised in vitro crosses of stickleback larvae with and without conventional microbiota. We then exposed all these treatments to Vibrio anguillarum, a potential fish pathogen, in a full factorial design. We found stickleback raised without conventional microbiota had smaller swim bladders relative to those raised with conventional microbiota. Stickleback raised with conventional microbiota exhibited small increases in cytokine gene expression. We found no differences in growth or survival regardless of treatment. These results are consistent with other investigations that show microbiota disruption, in early life, can alter host organ and tissue development and immune responses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.