Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32970760›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Colistin dry powder inhalation with the Twincer™: An effective and more patient friendly alternative to nebulization.

A M Akkerman-Nijland, F Grasmeijer, H A M Kerstjens, H W Frijlink, H van der Vaart, J M Vonk, P Hagedoorn, B L Rottier, G H Koppelman, O W Akkerman

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dry Powder Inhalers for Delivery of Synthetic Biomolecules.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A M Akkerman-NijlandDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, Beatrix Childrens' Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
F GrasmeijerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
H A M KerstjensGroningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
H W FrijlinkDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
H van der VaartDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J M VonkGroningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
P HagedoornDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
B L RottierDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, Beatrix Childrens' Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
G H KoppelmanDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, Beatrix Childrens' Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
O W AkkermanDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5638-9260
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNebulization of antimicrobial drugs such as tobramycin and colistin is a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, nebulization has a high treatment burden. The Twincer™ is a dry powder inhaler specifically developed for the inhalation of antibiotics such as colistin. The aim of this study was to compare patient outcomes and experience with colistin dry powder by the Twincer with nebulization of colistin or tobramycin in adult CF patients in a real-life setting.

methodsThis was a retrospective study from 01-01-2015 until 01-07-2018. Effectiveness was evaluated by comparing FEV1 decline and exacerbation rate during a mean of 4.1 years of nebulization therapy prior to the initiation of the Twincer against the same values during a mean of 1.7 years of treatment with the Twincer.

resultsTwenty-one patients were evaluated, of whom twelve could be included in the effectiveness analysis, with a total of twenty patient years. Of all patients 71.4% preferred therapy with the Twincer over nebulization. Twincer use resulted in high treatment adherence with an average adherence rate of 92.5%. There was no significant difference in annual decline in FEV1%pred prior to and after start changing from nebulization to the use of the Twincer powder inhaler (median decline -1.56 [-5.57-5.31] and 1.35 [-8.45-6.36]) respectively, p = 0.45 (linear mixed effect model)). No significant difference was found in the number of intravenous or combined total intravenous and oral antibiotic courses during Twincer therapy compared to when using nebulization (1.68 and 2.49 courses during Twincer therapy versus 1.51 and 2.94 courses during nebulization, p = 0.88 and p = 0.63).

conclusionColistin dry powder inhalation with the Twincer is a more patient friendly alternative to nebulization, and we did not observe significant differences in the clinical outcome, regarding lung function and exacerbation rates.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistinCystic FibrosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersPseudomonas InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistin

Identifiers

PMID32970760
PMCPMC7514010
OpenAlexW3087954680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.