Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32970759›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type.

Ju-Hyun Yoon, Jung-Yul Cha, Yoon Jeong Choi, Won-Se Park, Sang-Sun Han, Kee-Joon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tooth Complications after Orthodontic Miniscrews Insertion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ju-Hyun YoonDepartment of Orthodontics, Institute of Cranio-Facial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Jung-Yul ChaDepartment of Orthodontics, Institute of Cranio-Facial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Yoon Jeong ChoiDepartment of Orthodontics, Institute of Cranio-Facial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0781-8836
Won-Se ParkDepartment of Advanced General Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Sun HanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Kee-Joon LeeDepartment of Orthodontics, Institute of Cranio-Facial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0782-3128

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type on the interradicular miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization. MATERIALS AND

methodsCone-beam computed tomography images of 60 adults with skeletal Class I occlusion exhibiting hyperdivergent (n = 20), normodivergent (n = 20), and hypodivergent (n = 20) facial types were used. Placement of a 6-mm long, 1.5-mm diameter, tapered miniscrew was simulated at a site 4 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction, with insertion angles of 0°, 30°, 45°, and 60° relative to the transverse occlusal plane. The shortest linear distance between the miniscrew and anterior root at four interradicular sites was measured: maxillary second premolar and first molar (Mx 5-6), maxillary first and second molars (Mx 6-7), mandibular second premolar and first molar (Mn 5-6), and mandibular first and second molars (Mn 6-7).

resultsMiniscrew-root distance significantly increased as the insertion angle increased from 0° to 60°. In the mandible, the distances significantly differed among vertical facial types, increasing in the following order: hyperdivergent, normodivergent, and hypodivergent. The minimum mean distance was found in the Mx 6-7 (30°; 0.86±0.35 mm), and the maximum mean distance was found in the Mn 5-6 (60°; 2.64±0.56 mm). The rates of miniscrews located buccally outside the root distalization path were up to 70% and 55% when the miniscrews were placed at 60° insertion angles in the Mx 5-6 and Mn 5-6 regions, respectively.

conclusionsMiniscrew-root distance increased significantly with the increased insertion angle, and the amount of increase was affected by the miniscrew placement site and vertical facial type. To ensure adequate distalization of the posterior segment, the miniscrew should be inserted at an angle in the interradicular area between the second premolar and first molar.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsComputer SimulationAdultCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMolarOrthodontic Anchorage ProceduresTooth Movement TechniquesTooth Root

Identifiers

PMID32970759
PMCPMC7514046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.