ArticlePloS one2020
Bio-activating ultrafine grain titanium: RNA sequencing reveals enhanced mechano-activation of osteoconduction on nanostructured substrates.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Titanium is essentially absent from biological systems yet reliably integrates into bone. To achieve osseointegration, titanium must activate biological processes without entering cells, defining it as a bio-activating material. Nanostructuring bulk titanium reduces grain size, increases strength, and improves other quantifiable physical properties, including cytocompatibility. The biological processes activated by increasing grain boundary availability were detected with total RNA-sequencing in mouse pre-osteoblasts grown for 72 hours on nanometrically smooth substrates of either coarse grain or nanostructured ultrafine grain titanium. The average grain boundary length under cells on the conventional coarse grain substrates is 273.0 μm, compared to 70,881.5 μm for cells adhered to the nanostructured ultrafine grain substrates; a 260-fold difference. Cells on both substrates exhibit similar expression profiles for genes whose products are critical for mechanosensation and transduction of cues that trigger osteoconduction. Biological process Gene Ontology term enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes reveals that cell cycle, chromatin modification, telomere maintenance, and RNA metabolism processes are upregulated on ultrafine grain titanium. Processes related to immune response, including apoptosis, are downregulated. Tumor-suppressor genes are upregulated while tumor-promoting genes are downregulated. Upregulation of genes involved in chromatin remodeling and downregulation of genes under the control of the peripheral circadian clock implicate both processes in the transduction of mechanosensory information. Non-coding RNAs may also play a role in the response. Merging transcriptomics with well-established mechanobiology principles generates a unified model to explain the bio-activating properties of titanium. The modulation of processes is accomplished through chromatin remodeling in which the nucleus responds like a rheostat to grain boundary concentration. This convergence of biological and materials science reveals a pathway toward understanding the biotic-abiotic interface and will inform the development of effective bio-activating and bio-inactivating materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.