Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32970585›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2020

Feasibility of Health Literacy Tools for Older Patients in the Emergency Department.

Matthew J McGuinness, Joshua Bucher, James Karz, Carla Pardee, Laryssa Patti, Pamela Ohman-Strickland, Jonathan V McCoy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of instruments to measure health literacy of patients in emergency departments.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew J McGuinnessRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Joshua BucherRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
James KarzRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Carla PardeeRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Laryssa PattiRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Pamela Ohman-StricklandRutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey.
Jonathan V McCoyRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI PANOS G. GEORGOPOULOS · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study evaluates the feasibility of using a volunteer research associate (RA) to administer two separate health literacy assessment tools in the emergency department (ED), specifically in an older population of patients. The outcomes measured were administration time and interruptions.

methodsUsing a prospective, cross-sectional study with a convenience sample, adult patients over the age of 55 presenting between June-August 2018 to one urban, academic ED were evaluated by a volunteer RA using either the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) or the Short Assessment of Health Literacy (SAHL). All patients 55 years of age or older who consented to participate were included. We excluded from this study the following: patients with dementia or other disability involving reading, speech, or cognitive function, as noted in their medical record or by their attending physician; prisoners; and those subjectively deemed in extremis or too ill to participate by their attending physician.

resultsHealth literacy was assessed in 202 patients using either the NVS or SAHL. Mean time of administration was 214.0 seconds for the NVS, and 206.8 for the SAHL. The maximum time of administration for the NVS was 563 seconds, compared to 607 seconds for the SAHL. We found that 95.2% of NVS and 93.9% of SAHL tests incurred no interruptions during administration.

conclusionNo significant difference was found between the length of time needed to administer the NVS or SAHL to older patients in the ED. Both tools averaged an administration time of around three to four minutes, and neither incurred regular interruptions to its administration by a volunteer RA. Further study is needed to assess validity of these tools in an ED setting.

Indexed as

Mental Status and Dementia TestsNeuropsychological TestsAgedCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpeech-Language PathologySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32970585
PMCPMC7514378
OpenAlexW3084089440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.