SynthesisThe western journal of emergency medicine2020
Sepsis Alerts in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review of Accuracy and Quality Measure Impact.
Synthesis in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Alert fatigue measurement in clinical decision support: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Pooled it
- Sepsis Alert Systems, Mortality, and Adherence in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Smart Dosing, Better Outcomes: An Electronic Medical Record Intervention for Cancer Pain in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- The Sepsis ImmunoScore Predicts Sepsis, Mortality, and Deterioration Better than Clinical Scores and Widely Available Biomarkers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Roles and responsibilities of registered nurses in the early recognition and management of sepsis in acute hospital settings: a scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Linezolid-Associated Lactic Acidosis Triggering a Sepsis Alert: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- The future of healthcare-associated infection surveillance: Automated surveillance and using the potential of artificial intelligence.Journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of the National Early Warning Score-based sepsis response system on hospital-onset sepsis in a tertiary hospital in South Korea.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management in the Intensive Care Unit.Critical care research and practice · 2025Review
- Evaluation of sepsis CDS tool knowledge and utilization among graduate medical trainees: insights to inform redesign in an academic health system.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- External validation of the Epic sepsis predictive model in 2 county emergency departments.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Views and Uses of Sepsis Digital Alerts in National Health Service Trusts in England: Qualitative Study With Health Care Professionals.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Improving Sepsis Outcomes in the Era of Pay-for-Performance and Electronic Quality Measures: A Joint IDSA/ACEP/PIDS/SHEA/SHM/SIDP Position Paper.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Article
- Prevalence of electronic screening for sepsis in National Health Service acute hospitals in England.BMJ health & care informatics · 2023Article
- Audit of a computerized version of the Manchester triage system and a SIRS-based system for the detection of sepsis at triage in the emergency department.International journal of emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of automated alerting system compared to usual care for the management of sepsis.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Big data analyses and individual health profiling in the arena of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022Review
- Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFor early detection of sepsis, automated systems within the electronic health record have evolved to alert emergency department (ED) personnel to the possibility of sepsis, and in some cases link them to suggested care pathways. We conducted a systematic review of automated sepsis-alert detection systems in the ED.
methodsWe searched multiple health literature databases from the earliest available dates to August 2018. Articles were screened based on abstract, again via manuscript, and further narrowed with set inclusion criteria: 1) adult patients in the ED diagnosed with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock; 2) an electronic system that alerts a healthcare provider of sepsis in real or near-real time; and 3) measures of diagnostic accuracy or quality of sepsis alerts. The final, detailed review was guided by QUADAS-2 and GRADE criteria. We tracked all articles using an online tool (Covidence), and the review was registered with PROSPERO registry of reviews. A two-author consensus was reached at the article choice stage and final review stage. Due to the variation in alert criteria and methods of sepsis diagnosis confirmation, the data were not combined for meta-analysis.
resultsWe screened 693 articles by title and abstract and 20 by full text; we then selected 10 for the study. The articles were published between 2009-2018. Two studies had algorithm-based alert systems, while eight had rule-based alert systems. All systems used different criteria based on systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) to define sepsis. Sensitivities ranged from 10-100%, specificities from 78-99%, and positive predictive value from 5.8-54%. Negative predictive value was consistently high at 99-100%. Studies showed some evidence for improved process-of-care markers, including improved time to antibiotics. Length of stay improved in two studies. One low quality study showed improved mortality.
conclusionThe limited evidence available suggests that sepsis alerts in the ED setting can be set to high sensitivity. No high-quality studies showed a difference in mortality, but evidence exists for improvements in process of care. Significant further work is needed to understand the consequences of alert fatigue and sensitivity set points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.