ReviewThe British journal of radiology2020
Treatment outcomes after definitive radio(chemo)therapy for 17 lacrimal sac squamous cell carcinoma.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lacrimal Sac and Nasolacrimal Duct Tumors Mimicking Chronic Inflammation: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- A Rare Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Sac Originating from Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Primary adenocarcinoma of the lacrimal sac with 5-year recurrence-free survival after radiation therapy alone: a case report.International cancer conference journal · 2025Article
- Rare Case of Non-Keratinizing Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Lacrimal Sac Treated with Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Exclusive or combined endoscopic approach to tumours of the lower lacrimal pathway: review of the literature.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2024Review
- Lacrimal sac squamous cell carcinoma: From resection to prosthetic rehabilitation. A case report.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- Epiphora in Treated Lacrimal Drainage System Malignancy Patients - When and Whom to Treat? [Letter].Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinical and histological findings of 275 cases.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Lacrimal sac lymphoma: a case series and literature review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- HER2-Positive Lacrimal Sac Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a 57-Year-Old Man.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTumors of the lacrimal sac are rare and life-threatening. Because of their rarity, no extensive clinical data on their management and prognosis exist. We investigated the application of definitive radiation therapy and its outcome in patients with lacrimal sac squamous cell carcinoma (LSSCC).
methodsWe retrospectively studied 17 patients with LSSCC at a single institution between 2003 and 2017. All the patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy, and 11 patients were delivered with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The patients' clinical records were reviewed for symptoms, pathological types, the volume and dosimetry of the tumors and their adjacent structures, radiation coverage of lymph node drainage areas, treatment outcomes, and complications from definitive radiotherapy.
resultsMedian follow-up was 38.9 months, and age at diagnosis was 48 years.The 2-year and 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, locoregional control, and disease metastasis-free survival rates were 94.1 and 84.7%, 88.2 and 73.5%, 93.8%, 94.1, and 78.4%, respectively. A total dose of 6600-7000 cGy was prescribed to the tumor. Levels Ⅰb, Ⅶa, Ⅷ, and Ⅸ were covered with the clinical target volume regardless of lymph involvement. Acute Grade 3 radiation dermatitis occurred in seven patients (17.6%), but no acute Grade 4 or Grade 5 toxicity of any type occurred. Seven (41.2%, 7/17) of the treated eyes had moderated vision impairments; 17.6% (3/17) of patients developed cataracts, and glaucoma and radiation retinopathy were found in 5.9% (1/17) of patients.
conclusionsDefinitive radiotherapy could be a treatment option for those who refuse surgery or have unresectable LSSCC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Radiation alone is a treatment option for LSSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.