Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32970475›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2020

Treatment outcomes after definitive radio(chemo)therapy for 17 lacrimal sac squamous cell carcinoma.

Xinmao Song, Huanyu He, Yi Zhu, Shengzi Wang, Jie Wang, Weifang Wang, Yi Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exclusive or combined endoscopic approach to tumours of the lower lacrimal pathway: review of the literature.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lacrimal sac lymphoma: a case series and literature review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinmao SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4265-1851
Huanyu HeDepartment of Oncology, 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Kunming, China.
Yi ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shengzi WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jie WangDepartment of E.N.T., Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Weifang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Oncology, 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Kunming, China.
Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTumors of the lacrimal sac are rare and life-threatening. Because of their rarity, no extensive clinical data on their management and prognosis exist. We investigated the application of definitive radiation therapy and its outcome in patients with lacrimal sac squamous cell carcinoma (LSSCC).

methodsWe retrospectively studied 17 patients with LSSCC at a single institution between 2003 and 2017. All the patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy, and 11 patients were delivered with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The patients' clinical records were reviewed for symptoms, pathological types, the volume and dosimetry of the tumors and their adjacent structures, radiation coverage of lymph node drainage areas, treatment outcomes, and complications from definitive radiotherapy.

resultsMedian follow-up was 38.9 months, and age at diagnosis was 48 years.The 2-year and 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, locoregional control, and disease metastasis-free survival rates were 94.1 and 84.7%, 88.2 and 73.5%, 93.8%, 94.1, and 78.4%, respectively. A total dose of 6600-7000 cGy was prescribed to the tumor. Levels Ⅰb, Ⅶa, Ⅷ, and Ⅸ were covered with the clinical target volume regardless of lymph involvement. Acute Grade 3 radiation dermatitis occurred in seven patients (17.6%), but no acute Grade 4 or Grade 5 toxicity of any type occurred. Seven (41.2%, 7/17) of the treated eyes had moderated vision impairments; 17.6% (3/17) of patients developed cataracts, and glaucoma and radiation retinopathy were found in 5.9% (1/17) of patients.

conclusionsDefinitive radiotherapy could be a treatment option for those who refuse surgery or have unresectable LSSCC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Radiation alone is a treatment option for LSSCC.

Indexed as

Nasolacrimal DuctAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCataractChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalEye NeoplasmsFemaleGlaucomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free Survival

Identifiers

PMID32970475
PMCPMC8519631
OpenAlexW3088751710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.