Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32970472›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2020

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinomas <4 cm in difficult location.

Amar Mukund, Ravindran Ramalingam, Karan Manoj Anandpara, Yashwant Patidar, Rajan Vijayaraghavan, Shiv Kumar Sarin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ablation versus Radiation Segmentectomy for Small Liver Tumors.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Safety of CT-Guided Microwave Ablation of Subcardiac Liver Tumors.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amar MukundDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ravindran RamalingamDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Karan Manoj AnandparaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Yashwant PatidarDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rajan VijayaraghavanDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Shiv Kumar SarinDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTumor location is a critical factor for determining technical success and local recurrence following percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and outcome measures of percutaneous microwave ablation (pMWA) for HCCs <4 cm in difficult locations.

methodsRetrospective review included 81 patients who underwent pMWA for HCCs <4 cm. Fourty-three patients (30 males and 13 females; mean age, 61 years) with 53 HCCs located near the diaphragm, heart, gallbladder, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, large vessel and exophytic location were included under difficult location group. Thirty-eight patients (29 males and nine females; mean age, 60 years) with 48 HCCs in other locations were included under control group. Baseline demographics were recorded. Technical efficacy, local tumor progression (LTP), and complication rates were evaluated.

resultsMean follow-up period was 3.4 months (range 1-7). There was no major complication in both the groups; two patients had a mild perihepatic hemorrhage in the difficult location group which was managed conservatively. There was no difference between the groups in the overall technical efficacy rate (84.9%

conclusionOur data suggest that there is no significant difference in technical efficacy, LTP or complication rates for MWA in both difficult and normal locations. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: With proper patient selection, pre-procedural planning and appropriate technique, pMWA is feasible, safe, and effective for small HCCs in difficult location with an acceptable range of complications.

Indexed as

Radiofrequency AblationAdultAgedCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMicrowavesMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID32970472
PMCPMC7716003
OpenAlexW3088031297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.