Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32970306›Full record

ArticleJournal of physiology and biochemistry2020

Comparing an adiposopathy approach with four popular classifications schemes to categorize the metabolic profile of postmenopausal women.

Pascale Mauriège, Antony D Karelis, Nadine Taleb, Andrée-Anne Clément, Denis R Joanisse

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physiology and biochemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pascale MauriègeCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada. pascale.mauriege@kin.ulaval.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9375-532X
Antony D KarelisDépartement des Sciences de l'activité physique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Nadine TalebInstitut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Andrée-Anne ClémentCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Denis R JoanisseCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec · CAMontreal Clinical Research Institute · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

Diabète Québec 2012-2013Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 2009-2013Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval 2013-2014Université du Québec à Montréal 2007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous classifications are used to discern metabolically healthy obese (MHO) from metabolically abnormal obese (MAO) individuals. The goal of this study was to compare a single phenotype approach, adiposopathy (i.e., the plasma adiponectin/leptin ratio), with four commonly used classifications (International Diabetes Federation (IDF), Karelis, Lynch, Wildman), all based on obesity with other risk factors), for their ability to discern phenotypic differences between MAO and MHO postmenopausal women. Anthropometry, body composition, blood pressure, cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), lipid-lipoprotein, hepatic, inflammatory, and adipokine profiles, as well as glucose-insulin homeostasis, were assessed in 79 obese sedentary postmenopausal women (60 ± 5 years; body mass index, BMI, 34.0 ± 3.7 kg/m

Indexed as

MetabolomeObesityAdiponectinAgedFemaleHumansLeptinMiddle AgedPostmenopauseAdiponectinADIPOQ protein, humanLEP protein, humanLeptinAdiponectinAdipose tissueCardiometabolic riskInsulin sensitivityLeptinMenopause

Identifiers

PMID32970306
OpenAlexW3089274582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.