ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020
Missing data techniques in classification for cardiovascular dysautonomias diagnosis.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of key programmed cell death genes-necroptosis-related genes in systemic lupus erythematosus.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Identification of Disulfidptosis-Related Genes and Molecular Subgroups in Rheumatoid Arthritis for Diagnostic Model and Patient Stratification.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of machine learning and logistic regression as predictive models for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes of preeclampsia: A retrospective study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Different Data Mining Approaches Based Medical Text Data.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Missing data (MD) is a common and inevitable problem facing data mining (DM)-based decision systems in e-health since many medical historical datasets contain a huge number of missing values. Therefore, a pre-processing stage is usually required to deal with missing values before building any DM-based decision system. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the impact of MD techniques on classification systems in cardiovascular dysautonomias diagnosis. We analyzed and compared the accuracy rates of four classification techniques: random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), C4.5 decision tree, and Naive Bayes (NB), using two MD techniques: deletion or imputation with k-nearest neighbors (KNN). A total of 216 experiments were therefore carried out using three missingness mechanisms (MCAR: missing completely at random, MAR: missing at random and NMAR: not missing at random), two MD techniques (deletion and KNN imputation), nine MD percentages from 10 to 90% over a dataset collected from the autonomic nervous system (ANS) unit of the University Hospital Avicenne in Morocco. The results obtained suggest that using KNN imputation rather than deletion enhances the accuracy rates of the four classifiers. Moreover, the MD percentages have a negative impact on the performance of classification techniques regardless of the MD mechanisms and MD techniques used. In fact, the accuracy rates of the four classifiers decrease as the MD percentage increases. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32970269What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.