Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32970190›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2021

[Keratoconus detection and classification from parameters of the Corvis®ST : A study based on algorithms of machine learning].

Achim Langenbucher, Larissa Häfner, Timo Eppig, Berthold Seitz, Nóra Szentmáry, Elias Flockerzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Corneal biomechanics in early diagnosis of keratoconus using artificial intelligence.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Screening of sensitiveFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Achim LangenbucherInstitut für Experimentelle Ophthalmologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 22, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland. achim.langenbucher@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9175-6177
Larissa HäfnerKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 22, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland.
Timo EppigInstitut für Experimentelle Ophthalmologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 22, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland.
Berthold SeitzKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 22, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland.
Nóra SzentmáryDr. Rolf M. Schwiete Zentrum für Limbusstammzellforschung und kongenitale Aniridie, Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 22, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland.
Elias FlockerziKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 22, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIn the last decades increasingly more systems of artificial intelligence have been established in medicine, which identify diseases or pathologies or discriminate them from complimentary diseases. Up to now the Corvis®ST (Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology, Corvis®ST, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) yielded a binary index for classifying keratoconus but did not enable staging. The purpose of this study was to develop a prediction model, which mimics the topographic keratoconus classification index (TKC) of the Pentacam high resolution (HR, Oculus) with measurement parameters extracted from the Corvis®ST. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this study 60 measurements from normal subjects (TKC 0) and 379 eyes with keratoconus (TKC 1-4) were recruited. After measurement with the Pentacam HR (target parameter TKC) a measurement with the Corvis®ST device was performed. From this device 6 dynamic response parameters were extracted, which were included in the Corvis biomechanical index (CBI) provided by the Corvis®ST (ARTh, SP-A1, DA ratio 1 mm, DA ratio 2 mm, A1 velocity, max. deformation amplitude). In addition to the TKC as the target, the binarized TKC (1: TKC 1-4, 0: TKC 0) was modelled. The performance of the model was validated with accuracy as an indicator for correct classification made by the algorithm. Misclassifications in the modelling were penalized by the number of stages of deviation between the modelled and measured TKC values.

resultsA total of 24 different models of supervised machine learning from 6 different families were tested. For modelling of the TKC stages 0-4, the algorithm based on a support vector machine (SVM) with linear kernel showed the best performance with an accuracy of 65.1% correct classifications. For modelling of binarized TKC, a decision tree with a coarse resolution showed a superior performance with an accuracy of 95.2% correct classifications followed by the SVM with linear or quadratic kernel and a nearest neighborhood classifier with cubic kernel (94.5% each).

conclusionThis study aimed to show the principle of supervised machine learning applied to a set-up for the modelled classification of keratoconus staging. Preprocessed measurement data extracted from the Corvis®ST device were used to mimic the TKC provided by the Pentacam device with a series of different algorithms of machine learning.

Indexed as

KeratoconusArtificial IntelligenceCorneaCorneal TopographyGermanyHumansMachine LearningROC CurveArtificial intelligenceCorvisKeratoconusScheimpflug corneal tomographySupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID32970190
PMCPMC8260544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.