ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2021
Does the L5 spinal nerve move? Anatomical evaluation with implications for postoperative L5 nerve palsy.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Misplaced S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Causing L5 Spinal Nerve Injury: A Report of a Rare Case.Cureus · 2024Article
- L5 nerve root injury caused by anterolateral malpositioning of loosened S1 pedicle screws: illustrative cases.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhile palsy of the L5 nerve root due to stretch injury is a known complication in complex lumbosacral spine surgery, the underlying pathophysiology remains unclear. The goal of this cadaveric study was to quantify movement of the L5 nerve root during flexion/extension of the hip and lower lumbar spine.
methodsFive fresh-frozen human cadavers were dissected on both sides to expose the lumbar vertebral bodies and the L5 nerve roots. Movement of the L5 nerve root was tested during flexion and extension of the hip and lower lumbar spine. Four steps were undertaken to characterize these movements: (1) removal of the bilateral psoas muscles, (2) removal of the lumbar vertebral bodies including the transforaminal ligaments from L3 to L5, (3) opening and removing the dura mater laterally to visualize the rootlets, and (4) removal of remaining soft tissue surrounding the L5 nerve root. Two metal bars were inserted into the sacral body at the level of S1 as fixed landmarks. The tips of these bars were connected to make a line for the ruler that was used to measure movement of the L5 nerve roots. Movement was regarded as measurable when there was an L5 nerve excursion of at least 1 mm.
resultsThe mean age at death was 86.6 years (range 68-89 years). None of the four steps revealed any measurable movement after flexion/extension of the hip and lower lumbar spine on either side (< 1 mm). Flexion of the hip and lower lumbar spine revealed lax L5 nerve roots. Extension of the hip and lower lumbar spine showed taut ones.
conclusionSignificant movement or displacement of the L5 nerve root could not be quantified in this study. No mechanical cause for L5 nerve palsy could be identified so the etiology of the condition remains unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.