Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32970164›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2021

Long-term results of robotic radiosurgery for non brachytherapy patients with cervical cancer.

Janis Morgenthaler, Christhardt Köhler, Volker Budach, Jalid Sehouli, Carmen Stromberger, Angela Besserer, Maike Trommer, Christian Baues, Simone Marnitz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Janis MorgenthalerFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany. janis.morgenthaler@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7780-2170
Christhardt KöhlerDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg Altona, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 1, Hamburg, 22763, Germany.
Volker BudachDepartment for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
Jalid SehouliDepartment of Gynecology, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Carmen StrombergerDepartment for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
Angela BessererDepartment for Radiation Oncology, Campus Virchow-Clinic, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, Germany.
Maike TrommerFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany.
Christian BauesFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany.
Simone MarnitzFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEAsklepios Klinik Altona · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsolidation brachytherapy is a critical treatment component for cervical cancer patients undergoing primary chemoradiation. Some patients are unsuitable for brachytherapy for a variety of reasons. The use of alternatives (LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery or external beam boosts) compromise oncologic results in cervical cancer patients. Thus, we evaluated the value of brachytherapy-like doses prescriptions using robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife®, CR, Acuuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

methodsFrom 06/2011 to 06/2015, 31 patients (median age 53 years; range 30-77 years) with histologically proven FIGO stages IB-IVB cervical cancer underwent primary chemoradiation. All patients were either not suitable for intracervical brachytherapy for a variety of reasons or refused the brachytherapy. To achieve an adequate dose within the tumor, a CK boost was applied after fiducial implantation. In 29 patients, a dose of either five times 6 Gy or five times 5 Gy was prescribed to the target volume. Two patients received three times 5 Gy. The target dose was prescribed to the 70% isodose. Treatment toxicity was documented once weekly regarding vaginal mucositis, bladder, and bowel irritation according to CTCAE v. 4.03. If possible 3 months after completion of treatment intracervical curettage was performed to exclude residual tumor and the patients were followed up clinically. Sparing of organs at risk (OAR) and outcome in terms of local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed.

resultsOf the 31 patients, 30 have completed CK boost therapy. The median follow-up time was 40 months (range 5-84 months). General treatment tolerability was good. Except for 1 patient, who had diarrhea grade 3, no treatment related side effects above grade 2 were reported. Sparing of OAR was excellent. The 1‑, 3‑, and 5‑year OS rates were 89, 60, and 57% respectively across all stages. Seven patients showed progression (28%), only two of them with local relapse (8%), resulting in an LC rate of 92% after 3 and 5 years. Mean PFS was 41 months (range 2-84 months). Patients with local recurrence had PFS of 5 and 8 months. Five patients developed distant metastases. Fifteen patients (48%) underwent intracervical curettage 3 months after completion of treatment of which 14 (93%) had complete pathologic response.

conclusionBrachytherapy remains the standard of care for patients diagnosed with cervical cancer and indication for primary chemoradiation. In terms of local control, CyberKnife®-based boost concepts provide excellent local control. It can be an alternative for patients who cannot receive adequate brachytherapy. Distant relapse still remains a challenge in this context.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAdultAgedBrachytherapyChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyContraindications, ProcedureFemaleFiducial MarkersHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic IrradiationMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPostoperative ComplicationsBoostCyberknifeSBRTStereotactic Body RadiotherapyStereotactic Radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32970164
PMCPMC8154829
OpenAlexW3089142686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.