Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32969696›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2021

Reinforcer pathology's alternative reinforcer hypothesis: A preliminary examination.

Warren K Bickel, Allison N Tegge, Katelyn A Carr, Leonard H Epstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Warren K BickelFralin Biomedical Research Institute.
Allison N TeggeDepartment of Statistics.
Katelyn A CarrDepartment of Pediatrics.
Leonard H EpsteinDepartment of Pediatrics.

Funding

Can reinforcing alternatives to food prevent weight gain in children?R01HD088131 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Delay discounting as a target for self-regulation in prediabetesUH2DK109543 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2015 to 2017
$2.4M
Delay discounting as a target for self-regulation in prediabetesUH3DK109543 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2018 to 2019
$2.0M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088131NIDDK NIH HHS UH2 DK109543NIDDK NIH HHS UH3 DK109543NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe novel theory of Reinforcer Pathology states that the temporal window of integration, measured by delay discounting (DD), determines the value of reinforcers. Based on the Reinforcer Pathology theory, the valuation of alternative reinforcers is positively associated with the length of the temporal window (negatively with rates of discounting). The objective of this article is to test the Reinforcer Pathology theory by reanalyzing data from a prior report (Carr & Epstein, 2018) in order to examine the association between the reinforcing value of alternative reinforcement and the length of the measured temporal window.

methodParticipants (

resultsDelay discounting was significantly positively correlated with sedentary reinforcement and significantly negatively correlated with cognitively enriching activities. A significant interaction was observed in the preference for between food and cognitive-enriching context as a function ln(k) in predicting the cognitive-enriching activity class. Nonsignificant relationships were also observed with the correlation of delay discounting to the reinforcement of social and physical activities.

conclusionsThese findings provide initial support for Reinforcer Pathology theory and indicate that the temporal window over which reinforcers are integrated may be a factor contributing to a preference for some healthy or unhealthy alternative reinforcers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

FoodReinforcement, PsychologyChoice BehaviorHumans

Identifiers

PMID32969696
PMCPMC8376193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.