SynthesisNeuropsychology2021
Evidence for a robust, estradiol-associated sex difference in narrative-writing fluency.
Synthesis in Neuropsychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct and Convergent Beneficial Effects of Estrogen and Insulin on Cognitive Function in Healthy Young Men.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022Trial
- Cognitive strategy in verbal fluency: sex differences, menstrual cycle, and menopause effects.Cognitive processing · 2025Article
- Are women really (not) more talkative than men? A registered report of binary gender similarities/differences in daily word use.Journal of personality and social psychology · 2025Article
- Gender Differences in Usage and Subjective Appreciation of an Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Wildfire Evacuees: Descriptive Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Effects of oral contraceptives on spatial cognition depend on pharmacological properties and phase of the contraceptive cycle.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Do sex hormones at birth predict later-life economic preferences? Evidence from a pregnancy birth cohort study.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.