ReviewESC heart failure2020
Dying to know: prognosis communication in heart failure.
Review in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the short-form quality care questionnaire - palliative care in Brazilian patients with heart failure eligible for palliative care.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Understanding of Prognosis and Estimation of Mortality in Ambulatory Patients With Heart Failure.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Independent external validation of the LIFE-HF clinical prediction model using the GUIDE-IT trial.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Understanding Patient and Care Partner Experiences With Rehabilitation After Hospitalization for Advanced Heart Failure: "I Was Thinking I'd Just Be Like I Was Before I Got This".Physical therapy · 2026Article
- What makes serious illness conversations acceptable? A mixed-methods study of patient and caregiver experiences in oncology and cardiology.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Palliative Care in Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Its Impact on Symptoms, Quality of Life, and Decision-Making Process.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prognostic communication in heart failure: protocol for a systematic qualitative synthesis of experiences, attitudes and practices.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Perceived acceptability of a prototype toolkit to support patients and informal caregivers to express their perspectives in palliative care conversations.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- Desire for Prognostic Information Among Persons With Advanced Heart Failure.JACC. Heart failure · 2025Article
- Ethical Dilemmas Among Oncology Nurses in China: Cross-Sectional Study.Asian/Pacific Island nursing journal · 2024Article
- Association of filial attitude, filial behavior and death literacy: implications for development of death system in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area of China.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Challenges to Exploring the Patient Perspective in Palliative Care Conversations: A Qualitative Study Among Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Heart Failure Patients and Their Health Care Professionals.Palliative medicine reports · 2024Article
- Fighting Fires and Battling the Clock: Advance Care Planning in Family Medicine Residency.Family medicine · 2023Article
- A process-based approach to health-related quality of life as a "way of living".Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Review
- Characteristics of Clinicians Are Associated With Their Beliefs About ICD Deactivation: Insight From the DECIDE-HF Study.CJC open · 2021Article
- Dying to know: prognosis communication in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prognosis communication in heart failure is often narrowly defined as a discussion of life expectancy, but as clinical guidelines and research suggest, these discussions should provide a broader understanding of the disease, including information about disease trajectory, the experiences of living with heart failure, potential burden on patients and families, and mortality. Furthermore, despite clinical guidelines recommending early discussions, evidence suggests that these discussions occur infrequently or late in the disease trajectory. We review the literature concerning patient, caregiver, and clinician perspectives on discussions of this type, including the frequency, timing, desire for, effects of, and barriers to their occurrence. We propose an alternate view of prognosis communication, in which the patient and family/caregiver are educated about the nature of the disease at the time of diagnosis, and a process of engagement is undertaken so that the patient's full participation in their care is marshalled, and the care team engages the patient in the informed decision making that will guide care throughout the disease trajectory. We also identify and discuss evidence gaps concerning (i) patient preferences and readiness for prognosis information along the trajectory; (ii) best practices for communicating prognosis information; and (iii) effects of prognosis communication on patient's quality of life, mental health, engagement in critical self-care, and clinical outcomes. Research is needed to determine best practices for engaging patients in prognosis communication and for evaluating the effects of this communication on patient engagement and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.