Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32969178›Full record

ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2021

Corticosteroid and Local Anesthetic Use Trends for Large Joint and Bursa Injections: Results of a Survey of Sports Medicine Physicians.

Daniel M Cushman, Masaru Teramoto, Alexandra Asay, Nathan D Clements, Zachary L McCormick

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-Biologic Injections in Sports Medicine.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Identification of factors related to pain from musculoskeletal injections.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel M CushmanDivision of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0002-4580-1173
Masaru TeramotoDivision of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Alexandra AsayDivision of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Nathan D ClementsDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX.
Zachary L McCormickDivision of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0003-4250-8745
University of Utah · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysician decision-making surrounding choices for large joint and bursa injections is poorly defined, yet influences patient safety and treatment effectiveness.

objectiveTo identify practice patterns and rationale related to injectate choices for large joint and bursal injections performed by physician members of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM).

designAn electronic survey was sent to 3400 members of the AMSSM. Demographic variables were collected: primary specialty (residency), training location, practice location, years of clinical experience, current practice type, and rationale for choosing an injectate.

participantsA total of 674 physicians responded (minimum response rate of 20%).

interventionNot applicable.

main outcome measuresOutcomes of interest included corticosteroid type and dose, local anesthetic type, and total injectate volume for each large joint or bursa (hip, knee, and shoulder).

resultsMost respondents used triamcinolone (50% to 56% of physicians, depending on injection location) or methylprednisolone (25% to 29% of physicians), 21 to 40 mg (53% to 60% of physicians), diluted with lidocaine (79% to 87%) for all large joint or bursa injections. It was noted that 36.2% (244/674) of respondents reported using >40 mg for at least one injection type. Most (90.5%, 610/674) reported using an anesthetic other than ropivacaine for at least one type of joint or bursa injection. Physicians who reported lidocaine use were less likely to report that their injectate choice was based on the literature that they reviewed (odds ratio [OR] 0.41 [0.27-0.62], P < .001). Respondents predominantly used 5 to 7 mL of total injectate for all large joints or bursae (45% to 54% of respondents), except for the pes anserine bursa, where 3-4 mL was more common (51% of physicians).

conclusionsIt appears that triamcinolone and methylprednisolone are the most commonly used corticosteroids for sports medicine physicians; most physicians use 21 to 40 mg of corticosteroid for all injections, and lidocaine is the most-often used local anesthetic; very few use ropivacaine. Over one-third of respondents used high-dose (>40 mg triamcinolone or methylprednisolone) for at least one joint or bursa.

Indexed as

PhysiciansSports MedicineAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnesthetics, LocalHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularSurveys and QuestionnairesAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID32969178
PMCPMC8674102
OpenAlexW3088068153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.