Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32969109›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal physiology and animal nutrition2021

Effects of two zinc supplementation levels and two zinc and copper sources with different solubility characteristics on the growth performance, carcass characteristics and digestibility of growing-finishing pigs.

Sandra Villagómez-Estrada, José Francisco Pérez, Sandra van Kuijk, Diego Melo-Durán, Razzagh Karimirad, David Solà-Oriol

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sandra Villagómez-EstradaAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3086-3256
José Francisco PérezAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8853-8945
Sandra van KuijkTrouw Nutrition, Research and Development Department, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1264-9857
Diego Melo-DuránAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3944-1746
Razzagh KarimiradAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
David Solà-OriolAnimal Nutrition and Welfare Service, Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-340X
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of two Zn supplemented levels and two Zn and Cu sources (sulphate and hydroxychloride) on growing-finishing pigs. An in vitro study and an in vivo study were conducted. In the in vitro study, Zn solubility from each source at different Zn supplementation levels was evaluated, as well as the phytic phosphorus (PP) solubility derived from the interaction or not with phytic acid at similar conditions to those found in digestive tract. The most critical interaction of Zn with phytic acid was at pH 6.5 and with Zn sulphate, resulting in the reduction in PP solubility. In the in vivo experiment, a total of 444 pigs ([Duroc × Landrace]×Pietrain; initial BW: 18.7 ± 0.20 kg) were allotted to 36 pens in a randomized complete block design (2 × 2) factorial arrangement with two Zn and Cu sources and two Zn supplemental levels (20 and 80 mg/kg). The Cu supplementation was fixed at 15 mg/kg for all diets. There was no effect of the interaction between mineral source × Zn level or Zn level on growth performance or carcass characteristics (p > .10). Apparent total digestibility of Zn and Cu along with carcass yield was higher for pigs fed hydroxychloride than pigs fed the sulphate counterparts (p < .05). Feeding low levels of Zn decreased Zn (45.5%; p < .0001) and Cu(18.5%; p = .018) faecal excretion. In conclusion, under commercial conditions, feeding growing-finishing pigs with Zn levels below those established by the European Union regulation did not affect growth performance and carcass characteristics. Reducing dietary mineral (Zn and Cu) diet content resulted in a lower faecal mineral excretion. Pigs fed sulphate minerals had an improved performance during grower period, while pigs fed hydroxychloride minerals showed an improved performance during finishing period and a greater carcass yield and mineral digestibility than those fed sulphates.

Indexed as

CopperZincAnimal FeedAnimalsBody CompositionDietDietary SupplementsSolubilitySwineCopperZinccarcass characteristicscopper and zincdigestibilitygrowing pigssolubilitytrace mineral sources

Identifiers

PMID32969109
PMCPMC7821212
OpenAlexW3088820677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.