Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32968943›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2021

Examining the Priorities, Needs and Preferences of Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Designing a Personalised eHealth Exercise Intervention.

Holly E L Evans, Cynthia C Forbes, Corneel Vandelanotte, Daniel A Galvão, Robert U Newton, Gary Wittert, Suzanne Chambers, Ganessan Kichenadasse, Nicholas Brook, Danielle Girard and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Qualitative research exploring the complexities of exercise promotion in prostate cancer survivorship.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Holly E L EvansFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, PO Box 11060, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. holly.evans@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4593-8839
Cynthia C ForbesWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3259-1832
Corneel VandelanotteSchool of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Appleton Institute, Physical Activity Research Group, Central Queensland University, Bruce Highway, North Rockhampton, Queensland, 4702, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4445-8094
Daniel A GalvãoExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8209-2281
Robert U NewtonExercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0302-6129
Gary WittertFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, PO Box 11060, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6818-6065
Suzanne ChambersFaculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, New South Wales, 2007, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2369-6111
Ganessan KichenadasseCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9923-5149
Nicholas BrookDepartment of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Corner of North Terrace & George Street, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.
Danielle GirardSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7680-5604
Camille E ShortFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, PO Box 11060, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4177-4251
Edith Cowan University · AUFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health · AUCentral Queensland University · AUFlinders University · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of South Australia · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew individuals with metastatic prostate cancer have access to prostate cancer-specific exercise support, despite demonstrated benefits. eHealth tools, such as websites, may be viable options for increasing access. To be effective and acceptable, future eHealth websites need to consider end-users' perspectives, capacity and needs. We aim to provide insight into these factors by exploring daily priorities, activities and health literacy of individuals with metastatic prostate cancer and their perspectives towards exercise and exercise-based web-based eHealth interventions.

methodsSemi-structured interviews explored participant's experiences and understanding of their disease, exercise levels, advice received from health care providers, as well as acceptability of and suggested content for an eHealth tool. A thematic analysis was undertaken.

resultsInterviews were conducted with eighteen Australians (55-83 years; M = 71.5, SD = 8.9) living with metastatic prostate cancer. Needing to perform daily responsibilities was a key priority. Participants had limited understanding of the benefits of prostate cancer-specific exercise, and less than half discussed exercise with their health team. Fourteen men felt they could report metastases location, but only four could provide detailed information, which has clinical implications for exercise prescription. A potential web-based intervention was considered acceptable by seventeen men for reasons such as affordability, accessibility and convenience. User-friendly design and practitioner support were important.

conclusionsResults identified key aspects useful for person-centred design of exercise programs. Participants were positive towards the proposed web-based tool and expressed the need for individualised, user-friendly and reliable information with support from a professional embedded. Lastly, not all participants could accurately report metastasis locations.

Indexed as

Behaviour changeeHealthExerciseInternetMetastatic prostate cancerSupport needs

Identifiers

PMID32968943
OpenAlexW3089280740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.