Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy for Detection of Colon Polyps: a Prospective, Randomized Cohort Study.
Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07338643 (The Auxiliary Effect of Artificial Intelligence in the Detection of Precancerous Lesions in Proximal Colon Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Auxiliary Effect of Artificial Intelligence in the Detection of Precancerous Lesions in Proximal Colon Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy for colorectal lesion detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Convergence of disciplines: a systematic review of multidisciplinary development approaches in artificial intelligence.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- The diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted imaging for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Machine learning in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of radiology · 2024Pooled it
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Polyp and Adenoma Detection Rate During Colonoscopy: Systematic-Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Pooled it
- Randomized Controlled Trials of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for pre-operative lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence-Aid Colonoscopy Vs. Conventional Colonoscopy for Polyp and Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review of 7 Discordant Meta-Analyses.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Application of colonoscopic auxiliary devices in reducing the polyp miss rate: a prospective randomized controlled study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Linked-color imaging with or without artificial intelligence for adenoma detection: a randomized trial.Endoscopy · 2024Trial
- Impact of AI-aided colonoscopy in clinical practice: a prospective randomised controlled trial.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2024Trial
- Randomized Trial of Hood With or Without Wing Attachment-Assisted Colonoscopy With Linked Color Imaging and Computer-Aided in Adenoma Detection.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review of Adenoma Versus Polyp Detection Rates.Cureus · 2025Review
- Could artificial intelligence-powered colonoscopies change the future of colorectal cancer screening?World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Real-Time Artificial Intelligence Versus Standard Colonoscopy in the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Development of an AI-Assisted System for Automatic Recognition and Localization Marking of Colonic Polyps (With Video).Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- [Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Quality of Colonoscopy].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Review
- Transparency and Representation in Clinical Research Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Scoping Review.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsImproving the rate of polyp detection is an important measure to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC). Real-time automatic polyp detection systems, through deep learning methods, can learn and perform specific endoscopic tasks previously performed by endoscopists. The purpose of this study was to explore whether a high-performance, real-time automatic polyp detection system could improve the polyp detection rate (PDR) in the actual clinical environment.
methodsThe selected patients underwent same-day, back-to-back colonoscopies in a random order, with either traditional colonoscopy or artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy performed first by different experienced endoscopists (> 3000 colonoscopies). The primary outcome was the PDR. It was registered with clinicaltrials.gov . (NCT047126265).
resultsIn this study, we randomized 150 patients. The AI system significantly increased the PDR (34.0% vs 38.7%, p < 0.001). In addition, AI-assisted colonoscopy increased the detection of polyps smaller than 6 mm (69 vs 91, p < 0.001), but no difference was found with regard to larger lesions.
conclusionsA real-time automatic polyp detection system can increase the PDR, primarily for diminutive polyps. However, a larger sample size is still needed in the follow-up study to further verify this conclusion.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT047126265.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.