Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32968910›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Does laparoscopic reoperation yield symptomatic improvements similar to those of primary laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia patients?

Oscar Santes, Enrique Coss-Adame, Miguel A Valdovinos, Janette Furuzawa-Carballeda, Angélica Rodríguez-Garcés, Jose Peralta-Figueroa, Sofia Narvaez-Chavez, Hector Olvera-Prado, Uriel Clemente-Gutiérrez, Gonzalo Torres-Villalobos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Re-operation after prior esophagomyotomy.Journal of visualized surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Robotic redo Heller myotomy: how I do it?Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022
    Article
  4. Revisional Therapy for Recurrent Symptoms After Heller Myotomy for Achalasia.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Oscar Santes *Department of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Enrique Coss-Adame *Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Miguel A ValdovinosDepartment of Gastroenterology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Janette Furuzawa-CarballedaDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Angélica Rodríguez-GarcésDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jose Peralta-FigueroaDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sofia Narvaez-ChavezDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Hector Olvera-PradoDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Uriel Clemente-GutiérrezDepartment of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Gonzalo Torres-VillalobosDepartment of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico. torresvgm@yahoo.com.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-4995-592X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic Heller myotomy fails in approximately 3.5% to 15% of patients. Evidence of successful laparoscopic reoperation is limited to a few studies.

methodsThis case-control study was conducted in patients who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy reoperation (LHM-R) from 2008 to 2016. The operative outcomes, preoperative and last follow-up manometric parameters, and symptom questionnaire results, including the Eckardt, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and eating assessment tool (EAT-10) scores, were obtained. The data were compared with those of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM-1).

resultsThirty-five patients who underwent LHM-R and 35 patients who underwent LHM-1 were included. The reasons for failure in the LHM-R patient group included incomplete myotomy (71.4%), myotomy fibrosis (25.7%) and structural alterations in fundoplication (2.9%). The follow-up duration was 34 months for the LHM-R group and 24 months for the LHM-1 group (p = 0.557). The procedure was performed by laparoscopy in 100% of the patients in the two groups. No differences were found regarding surgical morbidity (11.4% LHM-R vs. 2.9% LHM-1, p = 0.164). The symptomatic outcomes were equivalent between groups (Eckardt p = 0.063, EAT-10 p = 0.166, GERD-HRQL p = 0.075). An IRP < 15 mmHg was achieved in 100% of the LHM-R and LHM-1 patients. At the last follow-up, 82.1% of the LHM-R patients and 91.4% of the LHM-1 patients were in symptomatic remission (p = 0.271).

conclusionThe results achieved with LHM-R are similar to those achieved with LHM-1. Laparoscopic reoperation should be considered an effective and safe treatment after a failed Heller myotomy.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaHeller MyotomyLaparoscopyCase-Control StudiesFundoplicationHumansQuality of LifeReoperationTreatment OutcomeAchalasiaHeller myotomyLaparoscopyReoperation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.