ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020
Extraction of Retinal Layers Through Convolution Neural Network (CNN) in an OCT Image for Glaucoma Diagnosis.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in glaucoma: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Pooled it
- Signal-carrying speckle in optical coherence tomography: a methodological review on biomedical applications.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Pooled it
- Retinal layer segmentation in OCT images with a 2.5D cross-slice feature fusion module for glaucoma assessment.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of deep learning models for disease classification in multi-organ histopathological images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Leveraging CNN and Transfer Learning With EfficientNet for Enhanced Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven diabetic retinopathy research: mapping the evolution, coupling, and global collaboration landscape (1996-2026).Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Relation knowledge distillation 3D-ResNet-based deep learning for breast cancer molecular subtypes prediction on ultrasound videos: a multicenter study.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Novel Deep Learning Model for Glaucoma Detection Using Fusion of Fundus and Optical Coherence Tomography Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Review
- Boundary-Repairing Dual-Path Network for Retinal Layer Segmentation in OCT Image with Pigment Epithelial Detachment.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence for the detection of glaucoma with SD-OCT images: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Automatic Diagnosis of Glaucoma from Retinal Images Using Deep Learning Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Automatic Segmentation and Measurement of Choroid Layer in High Myopia for OCT Imaging Using Deep Learning.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Article
- A Multimodal Classification Architecture for the Severity Diagnosis of Glaucoma Based on Deep Learning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Performance evaluation of various deep learning based models for effective glaucoma evaluation using optical coherence tomography images.Multimedia tools and applications · 2022Article
- Multilevel Deep Feature Generation Framework for Automated Detection of Retinal Abnormalities Using OCT Images.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Diagnosing Glaucoma Based on the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Dataset Using Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer as a Large Language Model.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glaucoma is a progressive and deteriorating optic neuropathy that leads to visual field defects. The damage occurs as glaucoma is irreversible, so early and timely diagnosis is of significant importance. The proposed system employs the convolution neural network (CNN) for automatic segmentation of the retinal layers. The inner limiting membrane (ILM) and retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) are used to calculate cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) for glaucoma diagnosis. The proposed system uses structure tensors to extract candidate layer pixels, and a patch across each candidate layer pixel is extracted, which is classified using CNN. The proposed framework is based upon VGG-16 architecture for feature extraction and classification of retinal layer pixels. The output feature map is merged into SoftMax layer for classification and produces probability map for central pixel of each patch and decides whether it is ILM, RPE, or background pixels. Graph search theory refines the extracted layers by interpolating the missing points, and these extracted ILM and RPE are finally used to compute CDR value and diagnose glaucoma. The proposed system is validated using a local dataset of optical coherence tomography images from 196 patients, including normal and glaucoma subjects. The dataset contains manually annotated ILM and RPE layers; manually extracted patches for ILM, RPE, and background pixels; CDR values; and eventually final finding related to glaucoma. The proposed system is able to extract ILM and RPE with a small absolute mean error of 6.03 and 5.56, respectively, and it finds CDR value within average range of ± 0.09 as compared with glaucoma expert. The proposed system achieves average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracies of 94.6, 94.07, and 94.68, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.