ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2021
Cryoablation with an 8-mm tip catheter for typical AVNRT in children: a single center 5-year experience.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiofrequency ablation vs. cryoablation for pediatric atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the era of three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Zero-Fluoroscopy Catheter Ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardias in the Pediatric Population.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Common Supraventricular and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Children.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn children with typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (tAVNRT), cryoablation is preferred over radiofrequency ablation (RFA) because of its safety profile and acceptable long-term success rates. In this study, we have assessed the utility of 8-mm tip cryocatheters for tAVNRT ablation in our center.
methodsAll pediatric AVNRT patients who underwent cryoablation with an 8-mm tip cryocatheter in our center between 2013 and 2018 were included. EnSite™ (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) was used in all patients.
resultsA total of 120 patients (64 females, 53%) were included in this study, and the mean age was 13.9 years with a standard deviation of 2.5 years. Eleven patients (9.1%) had structural heart disease, and 12 patients (10%) had additional arrhythmia substrate. The mean number of effective cryolesions was 8 with a standard deviation of 2.3. Fluoroscopy was used in three patients (2.5%). There were minor complications in only four patients (3.3%)-transient first-degree atrioventricular block or transient incomplete right bundle branch block. Acute success rate of cryoablation was 108/120 (90%). In twelve patients, cryoablation was suboptimal, or it failed. The procedure was completed successfully with RFA in the same session in ten patients. Overall acute success rate of ablation (Cryo ± RFA) was 98.5%. During a mean follow-up period of 24.6 months with a standard deviation of 11.3 months, three patients had recurrence (2.5%). Time between the beginning of the effective cryolesion and termination of AVNRT was found associated with acute success of cryoablation (p = 0.013).
conclusionsCryoablation of AVNRT with an 8-mm tip catheter in children appears to be safe, with an acceptable acute success rate and a low recurrence rate. A faster termination of AVNRT during the cryolesion, slowing down before ending with atrioventricular block, is a good indicator for acute success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.