ArticleLearning & behavior2021
Towards describing scenes by animals: Pigeons' ordinal discrimination of objects varying in depth.
Article in Learning & behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emotion Labeling in Pigeons.Affective science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The perception of a complex scene requires visual mechanisms that include identifying objects and their relative placement in depth. To examine apparent depth perception in birds, we tested four pigeons with a novel multiple-sequential-choice procedure. We created 3D-rendered scene stimuli containing three objects located at different apparent depths based on a variety of pictorial cues and placed small circular target response areas on them. The pigeons were trained to sequentially choose among the multiple response areas to report the object closest in apparent depth (ordinal position; front then middle object). After the pigeons learned this sequential depth discrimination, their use of three different monocular depth cues (occlusion, relative size, height in field) was tested, and their flexibility evaluated using three novel objects. In addition to the contribution to understanding apparent depth perception in birds, the use of more flexible open-ended choice discriminations, as employed here, has considerable promise for creating informative production-like tasks in nonverbal animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.