Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32968856›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2021

Policy in pediatric nephrology: successes, failures, and the impact on disparities.

Jill R Krissberg, Scott M Sutherland, Lisa J Chamberlain, Paul H Wise

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of adverse childhood experiences on kidney health.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jill R KrissbergDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room G-306, Stanford, 94304, CA, USA. jkrissbe@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3857-2536
Scott M SutherlandDivision of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room G-306, Stanford, 94304, CA, USA.
Lisa J ChamberlainDivision of General Pediatrics, Center for Policy, Outcomes, and Prevention, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Paul H WiseDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine;Center for Health Policy, Freeman-Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric nephrology has a history rooted in pediatric advocacy and has made numerous contributions to child health policy affecting pediatric kidney diseases. Despite this progress, profound social disparities remain for marginalized and socially vulnerable children with kidney disease. Different risk factors, such as genetic predisposition, environmental factors, social risk factors, or health care access influence the emergence and progression of pediatric kidney disease, as well as access to life-saving interventions, leading to disparate outcomes. This review will summarize the breadth of literature on social determinants of health in children with kidney disease worldwide and highlight policy-based initiatives that mitigate the adverse social factors to generate greater equity in pediatric kidney disease.

Indexed as

Kidney DiseasesNephrologyChildHealthcare DisparitiesHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansAdvocacyHealth disparitiesMarginalized populationsPolicy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.