Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32968838›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2020

The role of artificial ditches and their buffer zones in intensively utilized agricultural landscape.

Ivana Kozelová, Jana Špulerová, Viktória Miklósová, Katarína Gerhátová, Zita Izakovičová, Henrik Kalivoda, Michaela Kalivodová, Robert Kanka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivana KozelováInstitute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3, 814 99, Bratislava, Slovakia. ivana.kozelova@savba.sk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2122-0323
Jana ŠpulerováInstitute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3, 814 99, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Viktória MiklósováInstitute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3, 814 99, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Katarína GerhátováInstitute of Landscape Ecology, Branch Nitra, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Akademická 2, 949 10, Nitra, Slovakia.
Zita IzakovičováInstitute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3, 814 99, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Henrik KalivodaInstitute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3, 814 99, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Michaela KalivodováDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 1, 949 01, Nitra, Slovakia.
Robert KankaInstitute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3, 814 99, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

Agentúra Ministerstva Školstva, Vedy, Výskumu a Športu SR APVV 14-0735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extensive construction of drainage systems in the lowlands and flood plains of Slovakia has significantly changed the landscape and runoff ratios of rivers. Our study focuses on the assessment of the benefits provided by the ecosystems of water ditches and their catchment areas. Ditches and their buffer zone, similarly to other artificial anthropogenic elements in the country, fulfil various landscape-ecological functions and provide different ecosystem services (ESs) to human populations and society. As study areas, we chose ditches and their 1-km buffer zones in the Podunajská nížina (P) lowland and Východoslovenská nížina (V) lowland (Slovakia). There are notable differences between these two selected lowlands. Hence, there are also differences in their potential to provide various ESs. Based on a re-evaluation of the present state of the ditches, we evaluated nine ESs related to three main groups of ESs, using the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES). We assessed the ESs and benefits provided by ditches and their buffer zone in two ways: (1) ES assessment by experts and (2) biophysical assessment of ESs and their benefits based on an integrated assessment framework (relations between pressures, ecological status, and delivery of ESs). Finally, we compared the potentials for provisioning of the study areas. The study area in the V lowland has the highest potential to provide "Lifecycle maintenance, habitat and gene pool protection" benefits, and the study area in the P lowland has the highest potential to provide "Surface water for non-drinking purposes."

Indexed as

EcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringAgricultureRiversSlovakiaDitchesEcosystem servicesEcosystem statusHabitatsPressures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.