ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2020
Plaque imaging volume analysis: technique and application.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing the risk of recurrent in ipsilateral anterior circulation ischemic stroke.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Development of a nomogram model using the dual-energy computed tomography angiography parameters of carotid plaque, the vascular lumen, and perivascular fat to predict acute stroke events.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Atherosclerotic plaque instability in symptomatic non-significant carotid stenoses.JVS-vascular science · 2025Article
- Carotid artery calcium score: Definition, classification, application, and limits.The neuroradiology journal · 2024Article
- Diagnostic potential of TSH to HDL cholesterol ratio in vulnerable carotid plaque identification.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Added Clinical Value of Intraplaque Neovascularization Detection to Color Doppler Ultrasound for Assessing Ischemic Stroke Risk.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2024Article
- Multiparametric Quantitative Imaging Biomarker as a Multivariate Descriptor of Health: A Roadmap.Academic radiology · 2023Review
- Detecting vulnerable carotid plaque and its component characteristics: Progress in related imaging techniques.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Multimodality carotid plaque tissue characterization and classification in the artificial intelligence paradigm: a narrative review for stroke application.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevention and management of atherosclerosis poses a tough challenge to public health organizations worldwide. Together with myocardial infarction, stroke represents its main manifestation, with up to 25% of all ischemic strokes being caused by thromboembolism arising from the carotid arteries. Therefore, a vast number of publications have focused on the characterization of the culprit lesion, the atherosclerotic plaque. A paradigm shift appears to be taking place at the current state of research, as the attention is gradually moving from the classically defined degree of stenosis to the identification of features of plaque vulnerability, which appear to be more reliable predictors of recurrent cerebrovascular events. The present review will offer a perspective on the present state of research in the field of carotid atherosclerotic disease, focusing on the imaging modalities currently used in the study of the carotid plaque and the impact that such diagnostic means are having in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.