Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32968607›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Predictors of Neoplasia in Colonic Wall Thickening Detected via Computerized Tomography.

Cengiz Karacin, Sema Türker, Tulay Eren, Goksen Inanc Imamoglu, Kemalettin Yılmaz, Yusuf Coskun, Serra Ozbal Gunes, Fevzi Sökmen, Dogan Yazilitas, Zahide Şimşek and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictors of colorectal carcinoma and inflammatory bowel disease in patients with colonic wall thickening.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cengiz KaracinMedical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Sema TürkerMedical Oncology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Tulay ErenMedical Oncology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Goksen Inanc ImamogluMedical Oncology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Kemalettin YılmazGastroenterology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Yusuf CoskunGastroenterology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Serra Ozbal GunesRadiology, University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Fevzi SökmenInternal Medicine, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Dogan YazilitasMedical Oncology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Research and Education Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Zahide ŞimşekGastroenterology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Mustafa AltınbaşMedical Oncology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Ankara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRDışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Colonic wall thickening (CWT) is frequently observed incidentally via abdominal computerized tomography (aCT). Although the general approach to evaluating incidental CWT is a colonoscopic examination, there is a lack of definitive recommendation guidelines. Thus, we aimed to determine neoplasia rates and identify the factors predictive of neoplasia via colonoscopic examinations of patients with CWT incidentally diagnosed via aCT. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 5,300 colonoscopy reports. A total of 122 patients who had CWT incidentally observed via aCT were included in the study. CWT was graded as mild (3-5 mm), moderate (6-12 mm), or severe (≥12 mm). A logistic regression model was used to determine the predictive factors for neoplasia. Results The mean age of the patients was 60 years, and abnormal findings were noted in 52% of the colonoscopies. Neoplastic lesions were detected in 24 patients (19.6%), while colon adenocarcinoma was detected in 8 patients (6.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that moderate-severe, focal, and asymmetric CWT were independent factors for predicting neoplasia (p=0.049, p=0.033, and p=0.018, respectively). Conclusion Pathological findings can be noted via colonoscopic examination in cases of incidental CWT; therefore, patients with moderate-severe, focal, or asymmetric CWT require colonoscopic examination for the purpose of detecting neoplasia.

Indexed as

colonic wall thickeningcolonoscopycomputerized tomographyneoplasia

Identifiers

PMID32968607
PMCPMC7505674
OpenAlexW3087279608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.