ReviewCureus2020
Safety and Efficacy of Stem Cell Therapy in Patients With Ischemic Stroke.
Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of allogeneic umbilical cord blood cells and erythropoietin combination therapy in patients with subacute stroke.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Trial
- Safety and Efficacy of Stem Cell Therapy in Ischemic Stroke: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Dynamic MRI of the Mesenchymal Stem Cells Distribution during Intravenous Transplantation in a Rat Model of Ischemic Stroke.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clinical outcome and safety of stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical neurology international · 2022Review
- Pre-Clinical Proof of Concept: Intra-Carotid Injection of Autologous CD34-Positive Cells for Chronic Ischemic Stroke.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- An overview of mesenchymal stem cells and their potential therapeutic benefits in cancer therapy.Oncology letters · 2021Review
- Induced pluripotent stem cells can improve thrombolytic effect of low-dose rt-PA after acute carotid thrombosis in rat.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stem cell therapy is emerging as a promising treatment strategy to treat patients with stroke. While there are established modes of treatment for stroke patients such as thrombolysis and endovascular intervention, most of the stroke patients frequently end up with major residual deficits or even death. The use of stem cells to treat stroke has been found to be beneficial in the animal models but strict evidence for the same in humans is still lacking. We reviewed 13 clinical trials of stem cell therapy in stroke patients conducted between 2014 and 2020 based on the search using the database PubMed, and the clinical trial registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov). We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of stem cell treatment in stroke patients who participated in the trials. Quality assessment of the clinical trials revealed a sub-optimal score. We found mixed results regarding the efficacy of stem cells in the treatment of ischemic stroke although we could not do a quantitative analysis of the effect outcomes. Assessment for safety revealed promising results as there were only minor side effects related to cell therapy. Although stem cell therapy seems to be a promising strategy to treat stroke patients in the future, we concluded that the field needs more evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of the use of stem cells in stroke patients before we use them in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.