Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32968435›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020

Advancing COVID-19 differentiation with a robust preprocessing and integration of multi-institutional open-repository computer tomography datasets for deep learning analysis.

Eleftherios Trivizakis, Nikos Tsiknakis, Evangelia E Vassalou, Georgios Z Papadakis, Demetrios A Spandidos, Dimosthenis Sarigiannis, Aristidis Tsatsakis, Nikolaos Papanikolaou, Apostolos H Karantanas, Kostas Marias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. AI for COVID-19 Detection from Radiographs: Incisive Analysis of State of the Art Techniques, Key Challenges and Future Directions.Ingenierie et recherche biomedicale : IRBM = Biomedical engineering and research · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eleftherios TrivizakisComputational Biomedicine Laboratory (CBML), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.
Nikos TsiknakisComputational Biomedicine Laboratory (CBML), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.
Evangelia E VassalouDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece.
Georgios Z PapadakisComputational Biomedicine Laboratory (CBML), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.
Demetrios A SpandidosLaboratory of Clinical Virology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Dimosthenis SarigiannisHERACLES Research Center on the Exposome and Health, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 57001 Thermi, Greece.
Aristidis TsatsakisDepartment of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Nikolaos PapanikolaouComputational Biomedicine Laboratory (CBML), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.
Apostolos H KarantanasComputational Biomedicine Laboratory (CBML), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.
Kostas MariasComputational Biomedicine Laboratory (CBML), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic and its unprecedented consequences globally has spurred the interest of the artificial intelligence research community. A plethora of published studies have investigated the role of imaging such as chest X-rays and computer tomography in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) automated diagnosis. Οpen repositories of medical imaging data can play a significant role by promoting cooperation among institutes in a world-wide scale. However, they may induce limitations related to variable data quality and intrinsic differences due to the wide variety of scanner vendors and imaging parameters. In this study, a state-of-the-art custom U-Net model is presented with a dice similarity coefficient performance of 99.6% along with a transfer learning VGG-19 based model for COVID-19 versus pneumonia differentiation exhibiting an area under curve of 96.1%. The above was significantly improved over the baseline model trained with no segmentation in selected tomographic slices of the same dataset. The presented study highlights the importance of a robust preprocessing protocol for image analysis within a heterogeneous imaging dataset and assesses the potential diagnostic value of the presented COVID-19 model by comparing its performance to the state of the art.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCOVID-19deep learning analysismulti-institutional data

Identifiers

PMID32968435
PMCPMC7500043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.