Improving Rectal Cancer Outcomes with the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Guidance for the Management of Rectal Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Existing Guidelines Regarding Surgical Anatomy, Adjuvant Therapy, Follow-Up and Surveillance, Specific Considerations, Documentation, and Palliative Care.Cureus · 2025
   Review
2. Is the use of a transanal drainage tube effective in treating anastomotic leakage for mid-low rectal cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025
   Article
3. From Diversion to Permanence: Trends in Ostomy Creation in Rectal Cancer Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
   Review
4. "Impact of regional data reporting and feedback on rectal cancer surgery quality metrics in the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP)".Surgery open science · 2025
   Article
5. Optimization of rectal cancer surgery outcomes in the United States: the influence of hospital volume on rates of sphincter preservation before and after practice standardization.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025
   Article
6. Local excision vs. proctectomy in patients with ypT0-1 rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: a propensity score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024
   Observational
7. History and Role of Quality Accreditation.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
   Review
8. Watch-and-Wait Approach to Rectal Cancer: The Role of Imaging.Radiology · 2023
   Review
9. Multidisciplinary clinics for colorectal cancer may not provide more efficient coordination of care.American journal of surgery · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as