Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32968343›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Endoscopy Used as Provocative Testing in Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the Texas Public Use Data File.

Benjamin Clapp, Evan Liggett, Cheng Ma, Christian Castro, Simon Montelongo, Kelsey Van Noy, Joshua Dilday, Alan Tyroch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin ClappDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX.
Evan LiggettDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX.
Cheng MaDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX.
Christian CastroDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX.
Simon MontelongoDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX.
Kelsey Van NoyDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX.
Joshua DildayDepartment of Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX.
Alan TyrochDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX.
Texas Tech University · USWilliam Beaumont Army Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany bariatric surgeons test the anastomosis and staple lines with some sort of provocative test. This can take the form of an air leak test with a nasogastric tube with methylene blue dye or with an endoscopy. The State Department of Health Statistics in Texas tracks outcomes using the Texas Public Use Data File (PUDF).

methodsWe queried the Texas Inpatient and Outpatient PUDFs for 2013 to 2017 to examine the number of bariatric surgeries with endoscopy performed at the same time. We used the International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification Version 9 (ICD-9-CM) and ICD-10 procedure codes and Current Procedural Terminology for Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and endoscopy, and the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 diagnosis codes for morbid obesity.

resultsThere were 74,075 SG reported in the Texas Inpatient and Outpatient PUDF for the years 2013-2017. Of the SG performed, 5,521 (7.4%) had an intraoperative endoscopy. For the 19,192 LRYGB reported, 1640 (8.6%) underwent LRYGB + endoscopy. This was broken down by SG only vs SG + endoscopy and LRYGB only vs LRYGB + endoscopy. Overall, SG + endoscopy had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) vs LRYGB + endoscopy at 1.74 d vs 2.34 d (

conclusionsA small percentage of SG and LRYGB patients underwent endoscopy for provocative testing over the study period. Provocative testing with endoscopy costs more for SG and LRYGB and was associated with a shorter LOS.

Indexed as

AdultAnastomotic LeakBariatric SurgeryEndoscopyFemaleHospital CostsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesSurgical Wound DehiscenceTexasBariatric surgeryIntraoperative endoscopyLeak testRoux-en-Y gastric bypassSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID32968343
PMCPMC7489577
OpenAlexW3088098837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.