ArticleNature protocols2020
Solid-state
Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Boric Acid Post-Modified [Al]ZSM-5 Zeolites: Properties, Acidity, and Ethanol/Ethene Conversion.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Origin of theJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Microenvironment engineering unveils surface methoxy species origination in zeolite-catalyzed methanol chemistry under mild conditions.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Microenvironment perturbations driving methanol low-temperature conversion over zeolite.Science advances · 2025Article
- Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Surface Characterization of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: State of the Art and Perspectives.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Review
- Investigation of Brønsted acidity in zeolites through adsorbates with diverse proton affinities.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- How Water and Ion Mobility Affect the NMR Fingerprints of the Hydrated JBW Zeolite: A Combined Computational-Experimental Investigation.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022Article
- Molecular identification and quantification of defect sites in metal-organic frameworks with NMR probe molecules.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Elucidating the Cooperative Roles of Water and Lewis Acid-Base Pairs in Cascade C-C Coupling and Self-Deoxygenation Reactions.JACS Au · 2021Article
- Surface acidity of tin dioxide nanomaterials revealed withRSC advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid acid catalysts are used extensively in various advanced chemical and petrochemical processes. Their catalytic performance (namely, activity, selectivity, and reaction pathway) mostly depends on their acid properties, such as type (Brønsted versus Lewis), location, concentration, and strength, as well as the spatial correlations of their acid sites. Among the diverse methods available for acidity characterization, solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) techniques have been recognized as the most valuable and reliable tool, especially in conjunction with suitable probe molecules that possess observable nuclei with desirable properties. Taking
Indexed as
Identifiers
32968252What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.