ReviewNature reviews. Urology2020
Autonomous surgery in the era of robotic urology: friend or foe of the future surgeon?
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality assessment of public education short videos on robot-assisted cholecystectomy and analysis of audience preferences.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- From robot assistance to surgical intelligence: global research trends and emerging frontiers of artificial intelligence-enhanced robotic surgery in urology.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Perseus: perception with semantic endoscopic understanding and SLAM.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Automatic segmentation of male pelvic floor soft tissue structures for anatomical simulation and morphological assessment in lower rectal cancer surgery.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Digital health technologies in swallowing care from screening to rehabilitation: A narrative review.Auris, nasus, larynx · 2025Review
- Ethical aspects of artificial intelligence: what urologists need to know.Current opinion in urology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in the management of prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Article
- At the cutting edge: the potential of autonomous surgery and challenges faced.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2025Review
- A surgical activity model of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for co-operation with collaborative robots.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Landmarks in the evolution of prostate biopsy.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- Advanced surgical tool: Progress in clinical application of intelligent surgical robot.Smart medicine · 2022Review
- Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis.Science robotics · 2022Article
- COVID-19 and public support for autonomous technologies-Did the pandemic catalyze a world of robots?PloS one · 2022Article
- Automating Endoscope Motion in Robotic Surgery: A Usability Study on da Vinci-AssistedFrontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence in modern clinical practice (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in the past two decades, control of the robotic system currently remains under the command of a human surgeon. Historically, urology has pioneered new surgical techniques and technologies. Now, autonomous RAS is on the horizon and the first data from clinical trials of autonomous RAS in urology are being published. Automation takes control away from the surgeon but promises standardization of techniques, increased efficiency, potentially reduced complication rates and new ways of integrating intra-operative imaging. Preclinical and clinical evidence is emerging that supports the use of autonomous robotic-assisted urological surgery. Use of autonomous technologies in the operating theatre will directly affect the role of the urological surgeon. Integration of autonomous RAS can be viewed as a positive aid, but it might also be perceived as a threat to the future urological surgeon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.