Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32968190›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Successful breeding predicts divorce in plovers.

Naerhulan Halimubieke, Krisztina Kupán, José O Valdebenito, Vojtěch Kubelka, María Cristina Carmona-Isunza, Daniel Burgas, Daniel Catlin, James J H St Clair, Jonathan Cohen, Jordi Figuerola and 14 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Naerhulan HalimubiekeMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK. hn364@bath.ac.uk.
Krisztina KupánBehaviour Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
José O ValdebenitoMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Vojtěch KubelkaMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
María Cristina Carmona-IsunzaMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Daniel BurgasDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Daniel CatlinDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blackburg, USA.
James J H St ClairCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Jonathan CohenDepartment of Environmental and Forest Biology, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, USA.
Jordi FiguerolaDepartment of Wetland Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, Sevilla, Spain.
Maï YasuéQuest University Canada, Squamish, Canada.
Matthew JohnsonForest Supervisor's Office, USDA Forest Service, Plumas National Forest, Quincy, CA, USA.
Mauro MencarelliAssociazione ARCA, Senigallia-Anoca, Italy.
Medardo Cruz-LópezPosgrado en Ciencias del Mar Y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Cd. México, Mexico.
Michelle StantialDepartment of Environmental and Forest Biology, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, USA.
Michael A WestonSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering and the Built Environment, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Penn LloydFitzPatrick Institute, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Pinjia QueMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Tomás MontalvoServei de Vigilancia I Control de Plagues Urbanes, Agencia de Salud Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Udita BansalCentre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Grant C McDonaldDepartment of Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Yang LiuState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Ecology/School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China.
András KosztolányiDepartment of Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Tamás SzékelyMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
University of Bath · GBUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HUAgencia de Salud Pública de Barcelona · ESBeijing Normal University · CNChengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding · CNDeakin University · AUEstación Biológica de Doñana · ESIndian Institute of Science Bangalore · INMax Planck Institute for Ornithology · DEPurchase College · USQuest University Canada · CASun Yat-sen University · CNSUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry · USUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Debrecen · HUUniversity of Jyväskylä · FIUniversity of St Andrews · GBUS Forest Service · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When individuals breed more than once, parents are faced with the choice of whether to re-mate with their old partner or divorce and select a new mate. Evolutionary theory predicts that, following successful reproduction with a given partner, that partner should be retained for future reproduction. However, recent work in a polygamous bird, has instead indicated that successful parents divorced more often than failed breeders (Halimubieke et al. in Ecol Evol 9:10734-10745, 2019), because one parent can benefit by mating with a new partner and reproducing shortly after divorce. Here we investigate whether successful breeding predicts divorce using data from 14 well-monitored populations of plovers (Charadrius spp.). We show that successful nesting leads to divorce, whereas nest failure leads to retention of the mate for follow-up breeding. Plovers that divorced their partners and simultaneously deserted their broods produced more offspring within a season than parents that retained their mate. Our work provides a counterpoint to theoretical expectations that divorce is triggered by low reproductive success, and supports adaptive explanations of divorce as a strategy to improve individual reproductive success. In addition, we show that temperature may modulate these costs and benefits, and contribute to dynamic variation in patterns of divorce across plover breeding systems.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsBreedingCharadriiformesDivorceFemaleMalePair BondReproductionSexual Behavior, Animal

Identifiers

PMID32968190
PMCPMC7511398
OpenAlexW3088161351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.