Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32968120›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Nano-CT as tool for characterization of dental resin composites.

Håvard J Haugen, Saad B Qasim, Jukka P Matinlinna, Pekka Vallittu, Liebert Parreiras Nogueira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advanced materials and technologies for oral diseases.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Håvard J HaugenDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Geitmyrsveien 71, 0317, Oslo, Norway. h.j.haugen@odont.uio.no.
Saad B QasimDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Geitmyrsveien 71, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
Jukka P MatinlinnaDental Materials Science, Applied Oral Sciences & Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Pekka VallittuDepartment of Materials Science, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Liebert Parreiras NogueiraOral Research Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0317, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological advances have made it possible to examine dental resin composites using 3D nanometer resolution. This investigation aims to characterize existing dental nano-hybrid and micro-hybrid resin composites through comparing and contrasting nano-computed tomography (nano-CT) with micro-CT and high-resolution SEM images. Eight commercially available and widely used dental resin composites, 2 micro-hybrid and 6 nano-hybrid were researched. Cured samples were examined and characterized using nano-CT (resolution 450 nm) and compared with micro-CT images (resolution 2 µm). Acquired images were reconstructed and image analysis was carried out to determine porosity and pore morphology. A comprehensive comparison of scanning micrograph images unsurprisingly revealed that the nano-CT images displayed greater detail of the ultrastructure of cured dental resin composites. Filler particle diameters and its volumes were lower when measured using nano-CT, porosity being higher where analysed at higher resolution. There were large variations between the examined materials. Fewer voids were found in Tetric EvoCeram and IPS Empress Direct, the smallest pores being found in Universal XTE and Tetric EvoCeram. Nano-CT was successfully used to investigate the morphology of dental resin composites and showed that micro-CT gives a lower porosity and pore size but overestimates filler particle size. There were large discrepancies between the tested composites. Evidence of porosities and pores within a specimen is a critical finding and it might have a detrimental effect on a material's clinical performance.

Indexed as

Acrylic ResinsComposite ResinsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNanotechnologyPolyurethanesResins, SyntheticX-Ray MicrotomographyAcrylic ResinsComposite Dental ResinComposite ResinsPolyurethanesResins, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID32968120
PMCPMC7511412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.