Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32967886›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Impact of home-based family planning counselling and referral on modern contraceptive use in Karachi, Pakistan: a retrospective, cross-sectional matched control study.

Kristy Hackett, Elizabeth Henry, Imtiaz Hussain, Mirbaz Khan, Khalid Feroz, Navdep Kaur, Ryoko Sato, Sajid Soofi, David Canning, Iqbal Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kristy HackettGlobal Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA khackett@hsph.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3969-659X
Elizabeth HenryGlobal Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2547-597X
Imtiaz HussainPaediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mirbaz KhanPaediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Khalid FerozPaediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Navdep KaurDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Ryoko SatoGlobal Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sajid SoofiPaediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4192-8406
David CanningGlobal Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4041-1229
Iqbal ShahGlobal Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8850-4374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess: (1) the impact of a reproductive health program on modern contraceptive use from baseline to program close; (2) the sustained impact from baseline to follow-up 36 months later; and (3) the exposure-adjusted impact at program close and follow-up.

designRetrospective, cross-sectional matched control study.

settingKarachi, Pakistan.

participants2561 married women aged 16-49 years.

interventionsThe Willows Program, a community-based family planning counselling and referral program implemented from 2013 to 2015. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was community-level modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR), measured for January 2013 (baseline), June 2015 (program close) and at follow-up 36 months later. A secondary outcome was exposure-adjusted mCPR (among women reporting a family planning home visit) at program close and at follow-up.

resultsThere was no significant effect on community-level mCPR at program close (2.4 percentage point increase in intervention over comparison; 95% CI -2.2 to 7.0) or at follow-up (1.9 percentage point decrease; 95% CI -6.7 to 2.8). Only 18% of women in the intervention area reported receiving a family planning visit in the preceding 5 years. Among those reporting a visit, we observed a significant 10.3 percentage point increase (95% CI 4.6 to 15.9) from baseline to close, and a non-significant 2.0 percentage point increase (95% CI -3.8 to 7.8) from baseline to follow-up, relative to matched women in the comparison area. The cost per new modern method user was US$1089, while the cost per user-year during the intervention period was US$455.

conclusionsThe program had a positive short-term effect on women who received a family planning visit; however, this effect was not sustained. Program coverage was low and did not significantly increase community-level family planning use. Findings highlight the need to increase community coverage of high-quality counselling and contextually relevant interventions for family planning demand generation.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPakistanReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultContraceptive Agentspublic healthreproductive medicinesexual medicine

Identifiers

PMID32967886
PMCPMC7513633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.