Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32967704›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Motivational nondirective resonance breathing versus transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of fibromyalgia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Charles Ethan Paccione, Lien My Diep, Audun Stubhaug, Henrik Børsting Jacobsen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03180554 (Body Versus Machine), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03180554 nacompletednot on this map

Body Versus Machine: Motivational Nondirective Resonance Breathing Versus Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles Ethan Paccione, M.S., M.A.Ran2019 to 2020Enrolled105ConditionsChronic Widespread Pain, FibromyalgiaArmsTranscutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation (tVNS), Motivational nondirective resonance breathing (MNRB)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles Ethan PaccioneDoctoral Fellow in Medicine and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Klaus Torgårds 3, 0372, Oslo, Norway. Charles.Ethan.Paccione@Columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0091-5193
Lien My DiepOslo Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Sognsvannsveien 9, 0372, Oslo, Norway.
Audun StubhaugDepartment of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Kirkeveien 166, 0853, Oslo, Norway.
Henrik Børsting JacobsenDepartment of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Kirkeveien 166, 0853, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2017/766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic widespread pain (CWP), including fibromyalgia (FM), affects one in every ten adults and is one of the leading causes of sick leave and emotional distress. Due to an unclear etiology and a complex pathophysiology, FM is a condition with few, if any, effective and safe treatments. However, current research within the field of vagal nerve innervation suggests psychophysiological and electrical means by which FM may be treated. This study will investigate the efficacy of two different noninvasive vagal nerve stimulation techniques for the treatment of FM.

methodsThe study will use a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled design to investigate the treatment efficacy of motivational nondirective resonance breathing (MNRB™) and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (Nemos® tVNS) on patients diagnosed with FM. Consenting FM patients (N = 112) who are referred to the Department of Pain Management and Research at Oslo University Hospital, in Oslo, Norway, will be randomized into one of four independent groups. Half of these participants (N = 56) will be randomized to either an experimental tVNS group or a sham tVNS group. The other half (N = 56) will be randomized to either an experimental MNRB group or a sham MNRB group. Both active and sham treatment interventions will be delivered twice per day at home, 15 min/morning and 15 min/evening, for a total duration of 2 weeks (14 days). Participants are invited to the clinic twice, once for pre- and once for post-intervention data collection. The primary outcome is changes in photoplethysmography-measured heart rate variability. Secondary outcomes include self-reported pain intensity on a numeric rating scale, changes in pain detection threshold, pain tolerance threshold, and pressure pain limit determined by computerized pressure cuff algometry, blood pressure, and health-related quality of life. DISCUSSION: The described randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of two vagal nerve innervation interventions, MNRB and tVNS, on heart rate variability and pain intensity in patients suffering from FM. This project tests a new and potentially effective means of treating a major public and global health concern where prevalence is high, disability is severe, and treatment options are limited.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03180554 . Registered on August 06, 2017.

Indexed as

FibromyalgiaTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationVagus Nerve StimulationAdultHumansNorwayQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeVagus NerveChronic widespread painFibromyalgiaHeart rate variabilityMotivational nondirective resonance breathingPain intensityVagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32967704
PMCPMC7510318
OpenAlexW3087872119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.