ArticleGlobalization and health2020
Using volunteered geographic information to assess mobility in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-city time series analysis of 41 cities in 22 countries from March 2nd to 26th 2020.
Article in Globalization and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Open-source intelligence in public health: a decision-centred framework.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- The power of artificial intelligence for managing pandemics: A primer for public health professionals.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025Review
- Human mobility under disasters: a systematic review and framework for equitable and resilient mobility governance.npj natural hazards · 2025Article
- Association of School Instructional Mode with Community COVID-19 Incidence during August-December 2020 in Cuyahoga County, Ohio.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Meeting the challenges of the 21st century: the fundamental importance of trust for transformation.Israel journal of health policy research · 2024Article
- Human mobility and the infectious disease transmission: A systematic review.Geo-spatial information science = Diqui kongjian xinxi kexue xuebao · 2024Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing for common infections in primary care in England: a time-series analyses using OpenSAFELY and effects of predictors including deprivation.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2023Article
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Daily Mobility of the Elderly Living in Small Cities in Lodz Province.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Systematic literature review on impacts of COVID-19 pandemic and corresponding measures on mobility.Transportation · 2023Article
- Pedestrians and the Built Environment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Changing Relationships by the Pandemic Phases in Salt Lake County, Utah, U.S.A.Transportation research record · 2023Article
- Analysis of the impact of non-compulsory measures on human mobility in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic.Cities (London, England) · 2022Article
- Cross-border mobility responses to COVID-19 in Europe: new evidence from facebook data.Globalization and health · 2022Article
- Lockdown stringency and paediatric self-harm presentations during COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study.BJPsych open · 2022Article
- A North-South Problem in Civic-Tech and Volunteered Geographic Information as Countermeasures of COVID-19: A Brief Overview.SN computer science · 2022Review
- The ethical use of high-performance computing and artificial intelligence: fighting COVID-19 at Barcelona Supercomputing Center.AI and ethics · 2022Article
- Autoregressive count data modeling on mobility patterns to predict cases of COVID-19 infection.Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment : research journal · 2022Article
- National health governance, science and the media: drivers of COVID-19 responses in Germany, Sweden and the UK in 2020.BMJ global health · 2021Review
- Research into policy: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of public health · 2021Article
- A review of GIS methodologies to analyze the dynamics of COVID-19 in the second half of 2020.Transactions in GIS : TG · 2021Review
- Global impact of COVID-19 pandemic on road traffic collisions.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRestricting mobility is a central aim for lowering contact rates and preventing COVID-19 transmission. Yet the impact on mobility of different non-pharmaceutical countermeasures in the earlier stages of the pandemic is not well-understood.
designTrends were evaluated using Citymapper's mobility index covering 2nd to 26th March 2020, expressed as percentages of typical usage periods from 0% as the lowest and 100% as normal. China and India were not covered. Multivariate fixed effects models were used to estimate the association of policies restricting movement on mobility before and after their introduction. Policy restrictions were assessed using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Stringency Index as well as measures coding the timing and degree of school and workplace closures, transport restrictions, and cancellation of mass gatherings.
setting41 cities worldwide.
main outcome measuresCitymapper's mobility index.
resultsMobility declined in all major cities throughout March. Larger declines were seen in European than Asian cities. The COVID-19 Government Response Stringency Index was strongly associated with declines in mobility (r = - 0.75, p < 0.001). After adjusting for time-trends, we observed that implementing non-pharmaceutical countermeasures was associated with a decline of mobility of 10.0% for school closures (95% CI: 4.36 to 15.7%), 15.0% for workplace closures (95% CI: 10.2 to 19.8%), 7.09% for cancelling public events (95% CI: 1.98 to 12.2%), 18.0% for closing public transport (95% CI: 6.74 to 29.2%), 13.3% for restricting internal movements (95% CI: 8.85 to 17.8%) and 5.30% for international travel controls (95% CI: 1.69 to 8.90). In contrast, as expected, there was no association between population mobility changes and fiscal or monetary measures or emergency healthcare investment.
conclusionsUnderstanding the effect of public policy on mobility in the early stages is crucial to slowing and reducing COVID-19 transmission. By using Citymapper's mobility index, this work provides the first evidence about trends in mobility and the impacts of different policy interventions, suggesting that closure of public transport, workplaces and schools are particularly impactful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.