Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32967660›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Electronic cigarettes may not be a "safer alternative" of conventional cigarettes during pregnancy: evidence from the nationally representative PRAMS data.

Sooyong Kim, Sanda Cristina Oancea

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06297005 (The Impact of E-cigarettes During Pregnancy on Childhood Health Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06297005 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of E-cigarettes During Pregnancy on Childhood Health Outcomes (ECHO) Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College DublinRan2023 to 2027Enrolled1,200ConditionsVaping, Pregnancy Related, Pediatric Respiratory Diseases
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Birth outcomes following intrauterine exposure to electronic nicotine delivery systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Comparison of prenatal self-report of tobacco use to direct measurement of umbilical cord cotinine.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. A Preconception Cohort Study of Nicotine Vaping and Incidence of Spontaneous Abortion.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Intrapartum Electronic Cigarette Use and Birth Outcomes: Evidence from a Population-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  19. Acute exposure to electronic cigarette components alters mRNA expression of pre-osteoblasts.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Fetal Growth Following Electronic Cigarette Use in Pregnancy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sooyong KimBehavioral Sciences Group, Sanford Research, 2301 East 60th St N, Sioux Falls, SD, 57104, USA. skim@pinneyassociates.com.
Sanda Cristina OanceaDepartment of Population Health , University of North Dakota School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Grand Forks , ND, 58202, USA.
Sanford Research · USUniversity of North Dakota · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary approaches to American Indian and rural population health researchP20GM121341 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH/USD · PI ANGAL, JYOTI · 2017 to 2022
$11.8M
National Institute for General Medical Sciences 5P20GM121341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional cigarette (CC) smoking is one of the most preventable causes of adverse birth outcomes. Although electronic cigarettes (ECs) are considered to be safer than CCs during pregnancy, the evidence is yet to be presented. This study examines the effects of prenatal EC use on neonatal birth outcomes compared to those of CC smokers and complete tobacco abstainers.

methodsData was extracted from 55,251 pregnant women who participated in the Phase 8 survey of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System between 2016 and 2018. Participants were classified into three groups based on their smoking behaviors in the third trimester: complete tobacco abstinence, exclusive CC smoking, or exclusive EC use. Adverse outcomes included infants being small-for-gestational-age (SGA), having low birthweight (LBW), and being born at preterm. EC users were matched to complete abstainers and CC smokers who share the same baseline characteristics in race/ethnicity, age, educational attainment, income, prenatal care adequacy, and first- and second-trimester CC smoking statuses. The association between EC use and adverse birth outcomes were examined by survey-weighted logistic regression analyses in the matched population.

resultsAmong participants, 1.0% of women reported having used ECs during the third trimester, 60% of which reported using ECs exclusively. Neonates of EC users were significantly more likely to be SGA (OR 1.76; 95% CI 1.04, 2.96), have LBW (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.06, 2.22), or be born preterm (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.11, 3.12) compared to tobacco abstainers. However, odds of EC users' pregnancies resulting in SGA (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.30, 1.47), LBW (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.37, 1.37), or preterm birth (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.46, 2.48) were not significantly lower than those of CC smokers.

conclusionsEven after accounting for shared risk factors between prenatal tobacco use and adverse birth outcomes, EC use remains an independent risk factor for neonatal complications and is not a safer alternative to CC smoking during pregnancy. Until further research is completed, all pregnant women are encouraged to abstain from all tobacco products including ECs.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsPregnancy OutcomeAdultCigarette SmokingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPremature BirthVapingYoung AdultAdverse birth outcomesElectronic cigarettePRAMSPrenatal tobacco use

Identifiers

PMID32967660
PMCPMC7510270
OpenAlexW3088729286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.