Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32967654›Full record

ReviewBMC ophthalmology2020

Mycobacterium haemophilum scleritis: two case reports and review of literature.

Punyanuch Pisitpayat, Tasanee Sirikul, Poonpilas Hongmanee, Pitak Santanirand, Kaevalin Lekhanont

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DisseminatedJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026
    Article
  2. Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2026
    Article
  3. BMJ case reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Recurrent Subcutaneous Abscess from Co-Infection withInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Disseminated cutaneousBMJ case reports · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Punyanuch PisitpayatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama VI Rd., Rajathevi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Tasanee SirikulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama VI Rd., Rajathevi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Poonpilas HongmaneeDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pitak SantanirandDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kaevalin LekhanontDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama VI Rd., Rajathevi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. lekhanont@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2292-4581
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMycobacterium haemophilum is a rare and emerging nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). It normally causes localized or disseminated systemic diseases, particularly skin infections and arthritis in severely immunocompromised patients. There have been 5 cases of M. haemophilum ocular infections reported in the literature. Only 1 case presented with scleritis with keratitis. Here, we reported 2 cases of M. haemophilum scleritis. One of them was immunocompetent host and had keratitis with radial keratoneuritis as a presenting sign. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: A 52-year-old Thai female with rheumatoid arthritis presented with scleritis. Conjunctival scraping was carried out and the culture result was positive for M. haemophilum. Despite receiving systemic and topical antibiotics, her clinical symptoms and signs worsened. Surgical debridement was performed. After surgery, the lesion was significantly improved and finally turned to conjunctival scarring. Case 2: A 32-year old healthy Thai male without underlying disease presented with nodular scleritis and keratouveitis with multiple radial keratoneuritis. Surgical debridement of the scleral nodule was performed. Initial microbiological investigations were negative. Herpes ocular infections was suspected. Topical antibiotics, oral acyclovir, low-dose topical steroids and systemic steroids were started. The scleral inflammation subsided but later the keratitis relapsed, requiring corneal biopsy. Histopathology of the specimen revealed acid-fast bacteria and M. haemophilum was identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing. The diagnosis of Mycobacterial keratitis was made. Although using the combination of systemic and topical antibiotics, his clinical status progressively deteriorated. Multiple therapeutic penetrating keratoplasties were required to eradicate the infection. No recurrence was found during the 1-year follow-up in both cases.

conclusionsM. haemophilum can cause scleritis and keratitis, even in immunocompenent host. Radial keraoneuritis is first described in M. haemophilum keratitis. NTM keratitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with radial keratoneuritis. Increased awareness and early diagnosis using appropriate culture conditions and molecular techniques are important for the proper treatment of this infection. Prompt surgical intervention appears to be vital for successful management of M. haemophilum scleritis and keratitis.

Indexed as

Eye Infections, BacterialKeratitisMycobacterium haemophilumMycobacterium InfectionsScleritisAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCase reportKeratitisMycobacterium haemophilumNontuberculous mycobacteriaRadial keratoneuritisScleritis

Identifiers

PMID32967654
PMCPMC7513486
OpenAlexW3088868561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.