Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32967411›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2021

Validation of the NoSAS score for screening sleep-disordered breathing: A sleep clinic- based study in Turkey

Burcu Oktay Arslan, Zeynep Zeren Uçar, Özgür Batum, Mehmet Nurullah Orman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Burcu Oktay ArslanDepartment of Sleep Disorders, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Science, İzmir, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-4865-8982
Zeynep Zeren UçarDepartment of Sleep Disorders, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Science, İzmir, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-2271-3242
Özgür BatumDepartment of Chest Diseases, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Science, İzmir, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-8353-3421
Mehmet Nurullah OrmanDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-3544-9329
Izmir University · TREge University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: The NoSAS score is a new tool for the identification of high-risk patients for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). The aim of this study was to validate the NoSAS score in a sleep clinical population in Turkey and compare its performance with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), STOP-Bang, and Berlin questionnaires for high-risk SDB. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study. Patients who had a full-night PSG examination between 01.03.2017 and 01.01.2018 at the sleep center of our hospital were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, anthropometrics measurements, ESS, STOP-Bang, and Berlin scores were collected from the existing data of the patients. The NoSAS score was subsequently calculated based on available data. Predictive parameters for each screening questionnaires were calculated to compare the discriminative power of those for high-risk SDB. Results: A total of 450 patients were included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the NoSAS score were 81%, 51.2%, 88.2%, and 37.5% for an AHI (apnea–hypopnea index) ≥ 5 event/h and 84.5%, 38.2%, 66%, and 63.4% for an AHI ≥ 15 event/h, respectively. AUC percentages for the NoSAS score, STOP-Bang questionnaire, Berlin questionnaire, and ESS were 0.740, 0.737, 0.626, and 0.571 for an AHI ≥ 5 events/h and 0.715, 0.704, 0.574, and 0.621 for an AHI ≥ 30 events/h. The NoSAS score had a false negative rate of 2.9% for severe SDB. Conclusion: The NoSAS score had a good degree of differentiation for SDB and can be used as an easily applicable, subjective, and effective screening tool in a sleep clinical population in Turkey. Not only in moderate to severe SDB but also in mild SDB, the NoSAS score performed better than the other 3 screening tools.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSleep Apnea SyndromesAnthropometryFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPolysomnographyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexSleep HygieneSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyBerlin questionnaireNoSAS scoresleep-disordered breathingSTOP-Bang

Identifiers

PMID32967411
PMCPMC7991876
OpenAlexW3088146724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.