Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32967357›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2020

G-Quadruplexes in the Archaea Domain.

Václav Brázda, Yu Luo, Martin Bartas, Patrik Kaura, Otilia Porubiaková, Jiří Šťastný, Petr Pečinka, Daniela Verga, Violette Da Cunha, Tomio S Takahashi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. G-quadruplex propensity inNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Newly Sequenced Genome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. G-quadruplexes in helminth parasites.Nucleic acids research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Václav BrázdaInstitute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Královopolská 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2837-4226
Yu LuoInstitut Curie, CNRS UMR9187, INSERM U1196, Universite Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0614-6150
Martin BartasDepartment of Biology and Ecology/Institute of Environmental Technologies, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4415-2220
Patrik KauraFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 2896/2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic.
Otilia PorubiakováInstitute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Královopolská 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9940-0941
Jiří ŠťastnýFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 2896/2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr PečinkaDepartment of Biology and Ecology/Institute of Environmental Technologies, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Daniela VergaInstitut Curie, CNRS UMR9187, INSERM U1196, Universite Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7555-6033
Violette Da CunhaInstitut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (I2BC), CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, CEDEX, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9035-7825
Tomio S TakahashiInstitut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (I2BC), CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, CEDEX, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Patrick ForterreInstitut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (I2BC), CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, CEDEX, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Hannu MyllykallioLaboratoire d'Optique et Biosciences, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91128 Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0541-1197
Miroslav FojtaInstitute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Královopolská 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic.
Jean-Louis MergnyInstitute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Královopolská 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3043-8401
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics · CZUniversity of Ostrava · CZBrno University of Technology · CZMendel University in Brno · CZ

Funding

ERDF CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000477Grantová Agentura České Republiky 18-15548S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of unusual DNA structures in the regulation of basic cellular processes is an emerging field of research. Amongst local non-B DNA structures, G-quadruplexes (G4s) have gained in popularity during the last decade, and their presence and functional relevance at the DNA and RNA level has been demonstrated in a number of viral, bacterial, and eukaryotic genomes, including humans. Here, we performed the first systematic search of G4-forming sequences in all archaeal genomes available in the NCBI database. In this article, we investigate the presence and locations of G-quadruplex forming sequences using the G4Hunter algorithm. G-quadruplex-prone sequences were identified in all archaeal species, with highly significant differences in frequency, from 0.037 to 15.31 potential quadruplex sequences per kb. While G4 forming sequences were extremely abundant in

Indexed as

G-QuadruplexesArchaeaArchaeal ProteinsCircular DichroismDNADNA-Binding ProteinsGenome, ArchaealGenomicsNucleic Acid ConformationPhylogenyRNASpecies SpecificityArchaeal ProteinsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsRNAArchaeaG4-forming motifgenome analysissequence predictionunusual nucleic acid structures

Identifiers

PMID32967357
PMCPMC7565180
OpenAlexW3087642411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.