ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Is an Independent Predictor of Coronary Artery Ectasia in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Between Circulating Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Concentrations and Cardiovascular Events in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Coronary Artery Ectasia Presenting as ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy and Case-Based Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Reduced plasma levels of neuregulin-1 are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Long-Term Prognostic Value of Adipocytokines in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An 8-Year Clinical Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular tachycardia revealing coronary artery ectasia: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2023Article
- Coronary Artery Ectasia: Review of the Non-Atherosclerotic Molecular and Pathophysiologic Concepts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The Value of Fetuin-A as a Predictor to Identify Takotsubo Patients at Risk of Cardiovascular Events.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2021Article
- Treatment and Outcome of Patients With Coronary Artery Ectasia: Current Evidence and Novel Opportunities for an Old Dilemma.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Our purpose was to assess a possible association of inflammatory, lipid and mineral metabolism biomarkers with coronary artery ectasia (CAE) and to determine a possible association of this with acute atherotrombotic events (AAT). We studied 270 patients who underwent coronary angiography during an acute coronary syndrome 6 months before. Plasma levels of several biomarkers were assessed, and patients were followed during a median of 5.35 (3.88-6.65) years. Two interventional cardiologists reviewed the coronary angiograms, diagnosing CAE according to previously published criteria in 23 patients (8.5%). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to search for independent predictors of CAE. Multivariate analysis revealed that, aside from gender and a diagnosis of dyslipidemia, only monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) (OR = 2.25, 95%CI = (1.35-3.76) for each increase of 100 pg/mL,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.