Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32967184›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2020

Determinants of Intraparenchymal Infusion Distributions: Modeling and Analyses of Human Glioblastoma Trials.

Martin Brady, Raghu Raghavan, John Sampson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Designing Clinical Trials for Combination Immunotherapy: A Framework for Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Convection-Enhanced DeliveryFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Drug Design: Where We Are and Future Prospects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin BradyTherataxis, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.
Raghu RaghavanTherataxis, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.
John SampsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

Duke University 4605000549 and 4550219681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-parenchymal injection and delivery of therapeutic agents have been used in clinical trials for brain cancer and other neurodegenerative diseases. The complexity of transport pathways in tissue makes it difficult to envision therapeutic agent distribution from clinical MR images. Computer-assisted planning has been proposed to mitigate risk for inadequate delivery through quantitative understanding of infusion characteristics. We present results from human studies and simulations of intratumoral infusions of immunotoxins in glioblastoma patients. Gd-DTPA and

Indexed as

CED (convection-enhanced delivery)drug delivery planningpredictive flow modelstargeted drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID32967184
PMCPMC7559135
OpenAlexW3087414200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.