Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32967167›Full record

ReviewGenes2020

Exploring

Damer P Blake, Kate Worthing, Mark C Jenkins

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Occurrence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  6. Oral delivery ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Molecular Characterization of 18S rDNA, ITS-1, ITS-2, and COI fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  16. Eimeria proteins: order amidst disorder.Parasites & vectors · 2022
    Review
  17. ITS1-PCR based identification of chickenJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Damer P BlakePathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1077-2306
Kate WorthingAnimal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Building 1040, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Mark C JenkinsAnimal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Building 1040, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Agricultural Research Service · USRoyal Veterinary College · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H009337/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L00478X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiologyChickensCoccidiosisCoccidiostatsEimeriaGenome, ProtozoanPhylogenyPoultry DiseasesCoccidiostatschickensEimeriageneticsgenomepopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID32967167
PMCPMC7564333
OpenAlexW3087227606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.